Comments on: Add-ons Review Update – Week of 2010/08/31 http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/08/31/add-ons-review-update-16/ Mon, 20 May 2013 17:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Lenny http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/08/31/add-ons-review-update-16/comment-page-1/#comment-126874 Lenny Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:42:02 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=1801#comment-126874 On the main page this link came from – you didn’t code the “-” properly and it is showing up funky in the title.

]]> By: Mook http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/08/31/add-ons-review-update-16/comment-page-1/#comment-126329 Mook Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:21:52 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=1801#comment-126329 Yep, sorry about that – I was reading the planet.m.o page in a browser and going top-down (newest to oldest) and didn’t get to that post in time. Thanks! :)

]]> By: Jorge http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/08/31/add-ons-review-update-16/comment-page-1/#comment-126247 Jorge Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:27:43 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=1801#comment-126247 @Mook: the latest blog post on Firefox 4 compatibility addresses both of those. Thanks!

]]> By: Mook http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/08/31/add-ons-review-update-16/comment-page-1/#comment-126031 Mook Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:23:08 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=1801#comment-126031 Note that there hasn’t been a XULRunner SDK that matches a Firefox 4 beta yet, so binary extensions have no chance of being compatible (due to the change in XPCOM registration, the old SDK isn’t going to work). This means they can’t really _start_ on making changes yet.

In the future, if bug 533038 lands it might affect extensions which attempt to read files out of their installation (and expect them to be real files); I *think* it is meant to default to the existing behaviour, but I’m not sure.

]]>