<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sandboxed add-ons to be disabled next week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-154932</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-154932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you guys must have a 95-95-95 rule for addons to version 2.5 
95% of the addons are incompatible with foxfire &amp; sea monkey 2.5 of those that are compatible 95% of them are useless for 95% of the users]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys must have a 95-95-95 rule for addons to version 2.5<br />
95% of the addons are incompatible with foxfire &amp; sea monkey 2.5 of those that are compatible 95% of them are useless for 95% of the users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New AMO User</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-153297</link>
		<dc:creator>New AMO User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-153297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think they were too vague...

This Forum loses caps in Usernames / phpBB Search is Useless
https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=26&amp;t=3148

Status of Jetpack - What can it do NOW?
https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=27&amp;t=3152

Just as a suggestion, I recommend you &amp; other Firefox Devs periodically look at &quot;View unanswered posts&quot;...

View unanswered posts
https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/search.php?search_id=unanswered

...there are many posts that were never replied to. (some are your own Announcements tho)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they were too vague&#8230;</p>
<p>This Forum loses caps in Usernames / phpBB Search is Useless<br />
<a href="https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=26&#038;t=3148" rel="nofollow">https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=26&#038;t=3148</a></p>
<p>Status of Jetpack &#8211; What can it do NOW?<br />
<a href="https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=27&#038;t=3152" rel="nofollow">https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/viewtopic.php?f=27&#038;t=3152</a></p>
<p>Just as a suggestion, I recommend you &amp; other Firefox Devs periodically look at &#8220;View unanswered posts&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>View unanswered posts<br />
<a href="https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/search.php?search_id=unanswered" rel="nofollow">https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/search.php?search_id=unanswered</a></p>
<p>&#8230;there are many posts that were never replied to. (some are your own Announcements tho)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New AMO User</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-153296</link>
		<dc:creator>New AMO User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-153296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s failing to post my reply, with a blank white screen &amp; no msg as to why. I&#039;m gonna keep trying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s failing to post my reply, with a blank white screen &amp; no msg as to why. I&#8217;m gonna keep trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Villalobos</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-153222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Villalobos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-153222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* After you submit your add-on for review, you have the possibility of cancelling the request by either deleting the version you were submitting, or deleting the add-on entirely.
* On addons.allizom.org you can use the same account information as on the regular site. It&#039;s kind of a clone of the real site, but with somewhat old data and the code currently in development for the next version of the site.
* I don&#039;t think a Just Testing setting is worthwhile. Our system is extremely complex as it is, and there&#039;s no big need for this.
* I check the Forums weekly and respond to everything I can respond to. You can try posting again and rewording your questions. Maybe they were to vague to reply to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* After you submit your add-on for review, you have the possibility of cancelling the request by either deleting the version you were submitting, or deleting the add-on entirely.<br />
* On addons.allizom.org you can use the same account information as on the regular site. It&#8217;s kind of a clone of the real site, but with somewhat old data and the code currently in development for the next version of the site.<br />
* I don&#8217;t think a Just Testing setting is worthwhile. Our system is extremely complex as it is, and there&#8217;s no big need for this.<br />
* I check the Forums weekly and respond to everything I can respond to. You can try posting again and rewording your questions. Maybe they were to vague to reply to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New AMO User</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-153219</link>
		<dc:creator>New AMO User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-153219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You said: &quot;In the previous system, an add-on could be created, never submitted for code review, and still be permanently visible and searchable within the site.&quot;

...I would like to see a little bit of this come back, the &quot;never submitted for code review&quot; part.

When I create an Addon, I&#039;d like to be able to Submit it for &quot;Full Review&quot;, &quot;Prelim Review&quot; or &quot;No Review&quot;. The difference with the &quot;old system&quot;, would be that I want the &quot;No Review&quot; path to *only let me see it* (only let the Addon Author see it). It would be searchable &amp; visible TO ME, when logged in, but would not be to anyone else. This way, I can upload an Addon &amp; test the AMO interface, without taking up time on the Review Queue. Another question: if I submit an Addon for Full or Prelim Review, can I cancel that request?...or delete the Addon?

I previously mentioned this here...

An Overview of the AMO Review Process &#124; Mozilla Add-ons Blog
http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/04/overview-amo-review-process/comment-page-1/#comment-153111

...&amp; fligtar said I could use addons.allizom.org for testing, but he never followed up on the other questions. Do I use the same login?...or register again over there?

So, do you think a built-in way to select &quot;No Review&quot; (or &quot;Just Testing&quot;) would be a good thing to add to AMO? (it would not have the security concerns of the way the &quot;previous system&quot; handled it)

Also, on the Firefox Addons Forum, does anyone at Mozilla look at the &quot;Forum Concerns&quot; or &quot;Jetpack&quot; sub-forums? I posted 2 topics there &amp; neither one of them has gotten any response, from anyone.

(again, No Preview!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said: &#8220;In the previous system, an add-on could be created, never submitted for code review, and still be permanently visible and searchable within the site.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;I would like to see a little bit of this come back, the &#8220;never submitted for code review&#8221; part.</p>
<p>When I create an Addon, I&#8217;d like to be able to Submit it for &#8220;Full Review&#8221;, &#8220;Prelim Review&#8221; or &#8220;No Review&#8221;. The difference with the &#8220;old system&#8221;, would be that I want the &#8220;No Review&#8221; path to *only let me see it* (only let the Addon Author see it). It would be searchable &amp; visible TO ME, when logged in, but would not be to anyone else. This way, I can upload an Addon &amp; test the AMO interface, without taking up time on the Review Queue. Another question: if I submit an Addon for Full or Prelim Review, can I cancel that request?&#8230;or delete the Addon?</p>
<p>I previously mentioned this here&#8230;</p>
<p>An Overview of the AMO Review Process | Mozilla Add-ons Blog<br />
<a href="http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/04/overview-amo-review-process/comment-page-1/#comment-153111" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/04/overview-amo-review-process/comment-page-1/#comment-153111</a></p>
<p>&#8230;&amp; fligtar said I could use addons.allizom.org for testing, but he never followed up on the other questions. Do I use the same login?&#8230;or register again over there?</p>
<p>So, do you think a built-in way to select &#8220;No Review&#8221; (or &#8220;Just Testing&#8221;) would be a good thing to add to AMO? (it would not have the security concerns of the way the &#8220;previous system&#8221; handled it)</p>
<p>Also, on the Firefox Addons Forum, does anyone at Mozilla look at the &#8220;Forum Concerns&#8221; or &#8220;Jetpack&#8221; sub-forums? I posted 2 topics there &amp; neither one of them has gotten any response, from anyone.</p>
<p>(again, No Preview!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-150716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-150716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which add-on is yours?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which add-on is yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-150703</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-150703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;not marked as compatible with anything&quot;

That was not my experience at all.  I had an addon disabled for this very reason (even though it was enabled).  Seems kindof arbitrary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;not marked as compatible with anything&#8221;</p>
<p>That was not my experience at all.  I had an addon disabled for this very reason (even though it was enabled).  Seems kindof arbitrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Saunders</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-150368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-150368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jorge

Not sure what I was thinking. I do actually read the posts here and elsewhere pertaining to add-ons.
Perhaps I was thinking back to when this was being planned, and thought that sandboxed add-ons wouldn&#039;t be accessible to AMO visitors without a full review and there would be time limits on how long that they&#039;d sit on AMO, etc, etc.

Thanks again for your help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jorge</p>
<p>Not sure what I was thinking. I do actually read the posts here and elsewhere pertaining to add-ons.<br />
Perhaps I was thinking back to when this was being planned, and thought that sandboxed add-ons wouldn&#8217;t be accessible to AMO visitors without a full review and there would be time limits on how long that they&#8217;d sit on AMO, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-150346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-150346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I doubt somebody will run the disable script at midnight on a weekend. It&#039;s more likely that it will happen sometime next Monday, but I can&#039;t tell you for sure.
What do you mean &quot;I&#039;m working on it&quot;? All you need to do is nominate. You don&#039;t need to upload a new version or support Firefox 4 or even 3.6. All you need to do is nominate to avoid getting your add-on disabled, and after that you&#039;ll have all the time you need to work on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt somebody will run the disable script at midnight on a weekend. It&#8217;s more likely that it will happen sometime next Monday, but I can&#8217;t tell you for sure.<br />
What do you mean &#8220;I&#8217;m working on it&#8221;? All you need to do is nominate. You don&#8217;t need to upload a new version or support Firefox 4 or even 3.6. All you need to do is nominate to avoid getting your add-on disabled, and after that you&#8217;ll have all the time you need to work on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohei Yoshino</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/02/17/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-150332</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohei Yoshino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=2273#comment-150332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese translation is here:
https://dev.mozilla.jp/2011/02/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japanese translation is here:<br />
<a href="https://dev.mozilla.jp/2011/02/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/" rel="nofollow">https://dev.mozilla.jp/2011/02/sandboxed-add-ons-disabled-next-week/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
