<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mozilla Add-ons Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amp Your Firefox Contest &#8211; Overview by Amy Tsay</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/amp-your-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-164854</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Tsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?page_id=6275#comment-164854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mark, you can update any existing add-on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, you can update any existing add-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amp Your Firefox Contest &#8211; Overview by Amy Tsay</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/amp-your-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-164853</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Tsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?page_id=6275#comment-164853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got your first submission, so you can just enter the new one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got your first submission, so you can just enter the new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amp Your Firefox Contest &#8211; Overview by Amy Tsay</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/amp-your-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-164852</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Tsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?page_id=6275#comment-164852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Allasso, the Best Overall add-on will be chosen by the community from the pool of category winners. In other words, you choose which category you want to compete in, and the community decides which of the 5 category winners gets Best Overall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Allasso, the Best Overall add-on will be chosen by the community from the pool of category winners. In other words, you choose which category you want to compete in, and the community decides which of the 5 category winners gets Best Overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Add-on Compatibility for Firefox 22 by Jorge Villalobos</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/06/03/compatibility-for-firefox-22/comment-page-1/#comment-164851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Villalobos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=6546#comment-164851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t heard about any changes in this. However, it sounds more like a web compatibility issue than an add-on compatibility issue. Try &lt;a href=&quot;https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/mozilla.dev.tech.plugins&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;asking here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard about any changes in this. However, it sounds more like a web compatibility issue than an add-on compatibility issue. Try <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/mozilla.dev.tech.plugins" rel="nofollow">asking here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 22 Compatibility Update by Jorge Villalobos</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/06/11/firefox-22-compatibility-update/comment-page-1/#comment-164850</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Villalobos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=6580#comment-164850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You shouldn&#039;t wait until the release date to test your add-on. It can take weeks before an update for your add-on becomes available, and that will hurt your users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t wait until the release date to test your add-on. It can take weeks before an update for your add-on becomes available, and that will hurt your users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jetpack, Fennec and NativeWindow by Mindaugas J&#62;</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/06/13/jetpack-fennec-and-nativewindow/comment-page-1/#comment-164839</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindaugas J&#62;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=6486#comment-164839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pardon, I&#039;m an android n00b but it seems this post is misleading. 

I was not able to run arm emultion at all on my 64bit linux box. x86 images work but they are slow as hell especially Android 4+. Fennec crashes on Android 2.3, though. In any case, I couldn&#039;t even access the preferences, forget about remote debugging: the about:config page loads but is not rendered at all (the thumbnail in the tab selection is accurate, though).

So yeah, I would not say developing for fennec without Android device is happening any time soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon, I&#8217;m an android n00b but it seems this post is misleading. </p>
<p>I was not able to run arm emultion at all on my 64bit linux box. x86 images work but they are slow as hell especially Android 4+. Fennec crashes on Android 2.3, though. In any case, I couldn&#8217;t even access the preferences, forget about remote debugging: the about:config page loads but is not rendered at all (the thumbnail in the tab selection is accurate, though).</p>
<p>So yeah, I would not say developing for fennec without Android device is happening any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Add-on Compatibility for Firefox 22 by hanyu</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/06/03/compatibility-for-firefox-22/comment-page-1/#comment-164836</link>
		<dc:creator>hanyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=6546#comment-164836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about the NPAPI plugin? 

html:



Version is a property of NPAPI plugin. But in Firefox 22, it errors to get &#039;Version&#039; from:

document.getElementById(&#039;testplugin&#039;).Version.


Is there some changes about it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the NPAPI plugin? </p>
<p>html:</p>
<p>Version is a property of NPAPI plugin. But in Firefox 22, it errors to get &#8216;Version&#8217; from:</p>
<p>document.getElementById(&#8216;testplugin&#8217;).Version.</p>
<p>Is there some changes about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amp Your Firefox Contest &#8211; Overview by Mark Garcia</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/amp-your-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-164831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?page_id=6275#comment-164831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the Updated Add-on category requires that I upgrade my existing add-on, or can I update any existing add-on I&#039;m not the one who developed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Updated Add-on category requires that I upgrade my existing add-on, or can I update any existing add-on I&#8217;m not the one who developed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 22 Compatibility Update by Word Count</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2013/06/11/firefox-22-compatibility-update/comment-page-1/#comment-164823</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?p=6580#comment-164823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My add-on automatically got upgraded to be 22 compatible. I will wait till 25th June to actually test it in the real browser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My add-on automatically got upgraded to be 22 compatible. I will wait till 25th June to actually test it in the real browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amp Your Firefox Contest &#8211; Overview by Allasso Travesser</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/amp-your-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-164821</link>
		<dc:creator>Allasso Travesser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/addons/?page_id=6275#comment-164821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello, Amy,

On the submission page there is still no category in the drop-down for &quot;Best Overall Addon&quot;.  Is that category just a default of the other 5?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Amy,</p>
<p>On the submission page there is still no category in the drop-down for &#8220;Best Overall Addon&#8221;.  Is that category just a default of the other 5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
