<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, Windows Nightly Builds are Back!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/</link>
	<description>Its about time for some news...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caméléon</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>caméléon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that you should consider to update the Lightning screen-shots on AMO... They are really out-dated (maybe TB3.1?)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you should consider to update the Lightning screen-shots on AMO&#8230; They are really out-dated (maybe TB3.1?)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onesolo</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4797</link>
		<dc:creator>Onesolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I run Daily x86 and lightning was enabled, then I shut it off and run Daily x64 and Lightning was activated but saying on the next time it will be disabled... 
Still, it was enabled and it I can be seen on the Daily but with every feature disabled... too bad...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I run Daily x86 and lightning was enabled, then I shut it off and run Daily x64 and Lightning was activated but saying on the next time it will be disabled&#8230;<br />
Still, it was enabled and it I can be seen on the Daily but with every feature disabled&#8230; too bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Kewisch</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4783</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Kewisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed, there is no 64 bit windows version of lightning. This happens because Lightning has a binary component (dll) that needs to be compiled for each platform.

The 32 bit version of Thunderbird (and Firefox) is faster anyway, so I&#039;d suggest switching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed, there is no 64 bit windows version of lightning. This happens because Lightning has a binary component (dll) that needs to be compiled for each platform.</p>
<p>The 32 bit version of Thunderbird (and Firefox) is faster anyway, so I&#8217;d suggest switching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onesolo</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4782</link>
		<dc:creator>Onesolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m using the x64 build of the Daily 17.0a1. When trying to install the correspondent Lightning version, 1.9a1 it says that that cannot be installed because it&#039;s not compatible with that version of Daily...

Why this happens?!?! Because I&#039;m using a x64 build from Daily and the xpi is only compatible with x32 builds of Daily/Thunderbird ?!?! 
If yes, why all the other addon install fine?!?

Anyone can help me?!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the x64 build of the Daily 17.0a1. When trying to install the correspondent Lightning version, 1.9a1 it says that that cannot be installed because it&#8217;s not compatible with that version of Daily&#8230;</p>
<p>Why this happens?!?! Because I&#8217;m using a x64 build from Daily and the xpi is only compatible with x32 builds of Daily/Thunderbird ?!?!<br />
If yes, why all the other addon install fine?!?</p>
<p>Anyone can help me?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Kewisch</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Kewisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the note. I&#039;m still working on IT things, I&#039;ll put that on my list of things to fix.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the note. I&#8217;m still working on IT things, I&#8217;ll put that on my list of things to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Kewisch</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Kewisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will post more on this shortly, but be assured that Mozilla will continue to support Thunderbird until further notice. Check out this interview with Jb for more details: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mozilla.org/beyond-the-code/2012/07/09/about-the-future-of-thunderbird/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.mozilla.org/beyond-the-code/2012/07/09/about-the-future-of-thunderbird/&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will post more on this shortly, but be assured that Mozilla will continue to support Thunderbird until further notice. Check out this interview with Jb for more details: <a href="http://blog.mozilla.org/beyond-the-code/2012/07/09/about-the-future-of-thunderbird/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mozilla.org/beyond-the-code/2012/07/09/about-the-future-of-thunderbird/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve K</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4690</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As posted all over the &#039;Net, I understand that the Mozilla (Thunderbird) Development team will stop working on any future developments of the e-mail client, to focus more on the (Mozilla) O/S.

They will still provide security patches and other minor updates, but the development as such will cease!  

I am still getting daily updates for TB (Earlybird) and Lightning, which suits me just fine, but I do hope that Thunderbird will not be abandoned and that the development will resume in the near future!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As posted all over the &#8216;Net, I understand that the Mozilla (Thunderbird) Development team will stop working on any future developments of the e-mail client, to focus more on the (Mozilla) O/S.</p>
<p>They will still provide security patches and other minor updates, but the development as such will cease!  </p>
<p>I am still getting daily updates for TB (Earlybird) and Lightning, which suits me just fine, but I do hope that Thunderbird will not be abandoned and that the development will resume in the near future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4664</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there international builds for windows, the builds in latest-comm-aurora-l10n/win32-xpi/ are from may now.  The package in latest-comm-aurora/win32-xpi only installs english.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there international builds for windows, the builds in latest-comm-aurora-l10n/win32-xpi/ are from may now.  The package in latest-comm-aurora/win32-xpi only installs english.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4628</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello. The last Lightning 16b1 for TB14beta for Windows was June 13. Is there no later version available?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. The last Lightning 16b1 for TB14beta for Windows was June 13. Is there no later version available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/2012/06/finally-windows-nightly-builds-are-back/#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/calendar/?p=542#comment-4407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the &quot;Daily&quot; Lightning build compatible with the 64-bit TB 16a1?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the &#8220;Daily&#8221; Lightning build compatible with the 64-bit TB 16a1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
