<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/products/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products</link>
	<description>Products team blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by blizzard</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, both Chrome and Firefox do this already.  I can&#039;t remember what version we introduced it in but we back off timers in pages that aren&#039;t in the foreground.  We&#039;re also doing decode-on-draw in newer versions which means that we won&#039;t keep memory around for images that aren&#039;t on pages you aren&#039;t currently showing.

There&#039;s a lot of other things that need to happen, but that&#039;s just a start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, both Chrome and Firefox do this already.  I can&#8217;t remember what version we introduced it in but we back off timers in pages that aren&#8217;t in the foreground.  We&#8217;re also doing decode-on-draw in newer versions which means that we won&#8217;t keep memory around for images that aren&#8217;t on pages you aren&#8217;t currently showing.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of other things that need to happen, but that&#8217;s just a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by patrickjdempsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickjdempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s strange about this argument to me is that I simply haven&#039;t had a web page crash in YEARS... and even plugin crashing has been much more rare recently than in the past.  I&#039;ve actually purposefully killed the plugin-container process a few times just to make sure this feature is still working!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s strange about this argument to me is that I simply haven&#8217;t had a web page crash in YEARS&#8230; and even plugin crashing has been much more rare recently than in the past.  I&#8217;ve actually purposefully killed the plugin-container process a few times just to make sure this feature is still working!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 5 minor update for Mac coming soon by james page</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/08/firefox-5-minor-update-for-mac-coming-soon/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>james page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=74#comment-360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m on 10.6.8 and FF 5.0.1. and I&#039;ve had the text on text thing occasionally but overall FF has been well behaved. But recently, and i believe it was after some Apple software  updates, FF stopped working completely.
Does someone know if there is a fix coming soon or should i just chuck it and go back to Safari permanently?
JP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on 10.6.8 and FF 5.0.1. and I&#8217;ve had the text on text thing occasionally but overall FF has been well behaved. But recently, and i believe it was after some Apple software  updates, FF stopped working completely.<br />
Does someone know if there is a fix coming soon or should i just chuck it and go back to Safari permanently?<br />
JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by Mozilla to Bring Multi-core, Multi-process Content Support in Firefox</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla to Bring Multi-core, Multi-process Content Support in Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] company, which recently dished out Firefox 5, said in a blog post that it will bring multi-process content support on Firefox.  Mozilla’s Chris Blizzard said that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company, which recently dished out Firefox 5, said in a blog post that it will bring multi-process content support on Firefox.  Mozilla’s Chris Blizzard said that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 5 minor update for Mac coming soon by Phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/08/firefox-5-minor-update-for-mac-coming-soon/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=74#comment-350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 5 on Mac 10.6.8 is a disaster at best.  I tried to apply for a job and they wanted my information from Linkedin and I could not make it work. On my on line e statement with my bank certain selections are not there as they are on the same page with Safari. I consistantly get
text on top of text...at rawstory.com and other common sites. Its amazing that the authors could put this out with
all the severe problems. This text on top of text was on Firefox 4 too. Even the reporting page on help has distorted text and boxes that are half the size or omitted.
To report problems, I had to google the post address of Firefox and send a postcard with the post. Amazing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 5 on Mac 10.6.8 is a disaster at best.  I tried to apply for a job and they wanted my information from Linkedin and I could not make it work. On my on line e statement with my bank certain selections are not there as they are on the same page with Safari. I consistantly get<br />
text on top of text&#8230;at rawstory.com and other common sites. Its amazing that the authors could put this out with<br />
all the severe problems. This text on top of text was on Firefox 4 too. Even the reporting page on help has distorted text and boxes that are half the size or omitted.<br />
To report problems, I had to google the post address of Firefox and send a postcard with the post. Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by Mozilla To Implement Multiprocess Browsing</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla To Implement Multiprocess Browsing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 20, 2011 &#124; 0 Comments   According to Christopher Blizzard, Mozilla’s Web platform director, via a blog post, Mozilla has renewed its efforts to bring multiprocess browsing to Firefox. The post stresses the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20, 2011 | 0 Comments   According to Christopher Blizzard, Mozilla’s Web platform director, via a blog post, Mozilla has renewed its efforts to bring multiprocess browsing to Firefox. The post stresses the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feature Pages &amp; Lists &amp; Wikis, oh my by New feature pages, now with forms &#38; queries! &#124; Products</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/06/01/feature-pages-lists-wikis-oh-my/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>New feature pages, now with forms &#38; queries! &#124; Products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=49#comment-348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to go into a whole lot of detail since I&#8217;ve already blogged fairly extensively about this here, here, and here), so here&#8217;s the tl;dr [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to go into a whole lot of detail since I&#8217;ve already blogged fairly extensively about this here, here, and here), so here&#8217;s the tl;dr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by Mozilla Still Bent on Multi-Process Firefox - News &#124; Free Software and Shareware Downloads</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Still Bent on Multi-Process Firefox - News &#124; Free Software and Shareware Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;Since the release of Firefox 4 we&#8217;ve been working again to bring multi-process content support to Firefox,&#8221; Blizzard wrote. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Since the release of Firefox 4 we&rsquo;ve been working again to bring multi-process content support to Firefox,&#8221; Blizzard wrote. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by Scott Michaud</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Michaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are assuming that the input loop and the draw loop are synchronous. When you deal with multithreaded applications that is not a valid assumption even with video games these days. A game running at 122 FPS might only be updating the game loop at 30hz, and the input loop might not even be queried every game loop tick. The same idea is occurring here. Several frames can go by before an action is registered, but some frame in the next 50 ms will reflect my input.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are assuming that the input loop and the draw loop are synchronous. When you deal with multithreaded applications that is not a valid assumption even with video games these days. A game running at 122 FPS might only be updating the game loop at 30hz, and the input loop might not even be queried every game loop tick. The same idea is occurring here. Several frames can go by before an action is registered, but some frame in the next 50 ms will reflect my input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on goals for multi-process firefox by Axel Rauschmayer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/products/2011/07/15/goals-for-multi-process-firefox/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Rauschmayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/products/?p=85#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any rough predictions as to when we will have multi-process tabs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any rough predictions as to when we will have multi-process tabs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
