Comments on: Treehydra goes Push and Pop http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2008/05/27/treehydra-goes-push-and-pop/ Taras' blog on Snappy, Startup, Telemetry and other Firefox peroformance matters Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Johnny Stenback http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2008/05/27/treehydra-goes-push-and-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-17933 Johnny Stenback Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:19:00 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=62#comment-17933 nsI[Thread]JSContextStack::Push/Pop would be another one that’d be good to pay attention to.

]]> By: Vlad Sukhoy http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2008/05/27/treehydra-goes-push-and-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-17300 Vlad Sukhoy Wed, 28 May 2008 21:25:38 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=62#comment-17300 There may be constraints in layout which are statically verifiable using CFG analysis: perhaps some of the constraints on frame reflow, see docs in http://mxr.mozilla.org/firefox/source/layout/generic/nsIFrame.h

It will take real layout hackers to formulate them precisely, but I think we can enforce certain things there.

]]> By: bram http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2008/05/27/treehydra-goes-push-and-pop/comment-page-1/#comment-17299 bram Wed, 28 May 2008 13:14:02 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=62#comment-17299 I have a feeling that all this is going to make Fx 4 so much more awesome… wouldn’t it be an idea to keep track of all the nifty things like performance gains and resolved bugs that are due to these tools / the code refactoring for Mozilla 2?

Keep us posted :)

]]>