<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snappy, April 26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/</link>
	<description>Taras&#039; blog on Snappy, Startup, Telemetry and other Firefox peroformance matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: André</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35669</link>
		<dc:creator>André</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 09:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why was my comment deleted?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why was my comment deleted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: augustm</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35668</link>
		<dc:creator>augustm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 07:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

the SIGSTP could be an answer, if it could
be sent to firefox and the plugin compartments
on a user switch...

The kill is too strong since it looses the context
of the pages which are active.


It would resolve a major problem that I have at
home but also in my university lab where we also
have user switching activated -- with machines getting bogged down by background sessions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>the SIGSTP could be an answer, if it could<br />
be sent to firefox and the plugin compartments<br />
on a user switch&#8230;</p>
<p>The kill is too strong since it looses the context<br />
of the pages which are active.</p>
<p>It would resolve a major problem that I have at<br />
home but also in my university lab where we also<br />
have user switching activated &#8212; with machines getting bogged down by background sessions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35665</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@augustm, I&#039;m not sure how we would do this. This might be easier to do via OS functionality like kill -SIGSTP to suspend inactive instances. Android solves this by killing background apps forcing apps to restart and restore state when you return to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@augustm, I&#8217;m not sure how we would do this. This might be easier to do via OS functionality like kill -SIGSTP to suspend inactive instances. Android solves this by killing background apps forcing apps to restart and restore state when you return to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@tglek: Thx, i hope the community could just hold on a little longer before Firefox regain some market shares.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tglek: Thx, i hope the community could just hold on a little longer before Firefox regain some market shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: augustm</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35655</link>
		<dc:creator>augustm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 08:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multiple users-

I am often confronted with the following problem-

I have carefully set up user switching on my macs-
so my kids can play web games, mess about on youtube, without impacting my own work environment.

There are thus often two or three instances of
firefox active. However, even when a person
is not using a session firefox can
actively eat lots of CPU, and set of the fans,
generally slowing the whole system down.

Is there a way of setting up a much stronger throttling of firefox if it is not in the active
session... There was already some talk about this a couple of weeks back for tabs, but this seems even more
useful. Even music playing, (for instance), in one of
these sessions is not sent to a speaker]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple users-</p>
<p>I am often confronted with the following problem-</p>
<p>I have carefully set up user switching on my macs-<br />
so my kids can play web games, mess about on youtube, without impacting my own work environment.</p>
<p>There are thus often two or three instances of<br />
firefox active. However, even when a person<br />
is not using a session firefox can<br />
actively eat lots of CPU, and set of the fans,<br />
generally slowing the whole system down.</p>
<p>Is there a way of setting up a much stronger throttling of firefox if it is not in the active<br />
session&#8230; There was already some talk about this a couple of weeks back for tabs, but this seems even more<br />
useful. Even music playing, (for instance), in one of<br />
these sessions is not sent to a speaker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC_Yang</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35654</link>
		<dc:creator>JC_Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[taras, do you miss this one?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729133
It&#039;s marked as Snappy:P1, may help user experience faster page load, sometimes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taras, do you miss this one?<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729133" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729133</a><br />
It&#8217;s marked as Snappy:P1, may help user experience faster page load, sometimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35651</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ed, Brian works quietly, but effectively. I expect good things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ed, Brian works quietly, but effectively. I expect good things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35650</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No news on supersnapppy &gt;&lt;...... someday someone may just start a kickstater project on that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No news on supersnapppy &gt;&lt;&#8230;&#8230; someday someone may just start a kickstater project on that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smaug</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/04/26/snappy-april-26/comment-page-1/#comment-35649</link>
		<dc:creator>smaug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=643#comment-35649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bug 695480 is a major Snappy bug which landed recently.
It is marked as MemShrink, but it is even more about
responsiveness, since it should prevent
zombie documents in certain cases. Zombie documents
make CC times high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bug 695480 is a major Snappy bug which landed recently.<br />
It is marked as MemShrink, but it is even more about<br />
responsiveness, since it should prevent<br />
zombie documents in certain cases. Zombie documents<br />
make CC times high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
