<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snappy in Warsaw: pierogy-fueled hackfest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/</link>
	<description>Taras&#039; blog on Snappy, Startup, Telemetry and other Firefox peroformance matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: herom</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-36000</link>
		<dc:creator>herom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-36000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just wondering if the following bug would cause significant faster startups and called &quot;snappy&quot; too?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776928]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wondering if the following bug would cause significant faster startups and called &#8220;snappy&#8221; too?</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776928" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776928</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timbuzilla</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35999</link>
		<dc:creator>timbuzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 03:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Taras, I have been noticing (often severe) jank on a lot of google services&#039; pages. 

The worst is when opening many blogspot sites (it will hang the browser). Most time seems to be spent in the YARR interpreter. This has been profiled (with the gecko profiler) here and reported here:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792797

Another user reported a bug on it (with profile) here:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791627

Have also profiled and reported jank when opening a google groups page:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793359

A mozilla dev recently reported several seconds of jank when opening a google doc:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790270

Cheers,

Tim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taras, I have been noticing (often severe) jank on a lot of google services&#8217; pages. </p>
<p>The worst is when opening many blogspot sites (it will hang the browser). Most time seems to be spent in the YARR interpreter. This has been profiled (with the gecko profiler) here and reported here:</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792797" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792797</a></p>
<p>Another user reported a bug on it (with profile) here:</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791627" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791627</a></p>
<p>Have also profiled and reported jank when opening a google groups page:</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793359" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793359</a></p>
<p>A mozilla dev recently reported several seconds of jank when opening a google doc:</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790270" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790270</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godot</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35996</link>
		<dc:creator>godot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@JC_Yang I didn&#039;t meant to say Snappy and E10 have the same purpose. I may have not have expressed me clearly.
I just remember Tara was working on other subjects before Snappy --mainly E10 at that time-- and wondered how he expects his work to evolve with Snappy.
Is it expected to focuse mainly on Snappy for another 3, 6 months, one year? And how Snappy will be handled when the main efforts are complete and the biggest part of his work shifts to other activities.
But maybe Snappy&#039;s birthday will be a more appropriate time to draw this wider picture of the project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JC_Yang I didn&#8217;t meant to say Snappy and E10 have the same purpose. I may have not have expressed me clearly.<br />
I just remember Tara was working on other subjects before Snappy &#8211;mainly E10 at that time&#8211; and wondered how he expects his work to evolve with Snappy.<br />
Is it expected to focuse mainly on Snappy for another 3, 6 months, one year? And how Snappy will be handled when the main efforts are complete and the biggest part of his work shifts to other activities.<br />
But maybe Snappy&#8217;s birthday will be a more appropriate time to draw this wider picture of the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35995</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pd https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Performance/Profiling_with_the_Built-in_Profiler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pd <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Performance/Profiling_with_the_Built-in_Profiler" rel="nofollow">https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Performance/Profiling_with_the_Built-in_Profiler</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pd</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35993</link>
		<dc:creator>pd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 01:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Taras, thanks for your response. Which Add-on are you referring to? One of these?

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/xul-profiler-by-yoono/

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/memory-profiler/

?

Neither of those are marked for compatibility with the version of Aurora I&#039;m currently using. Is it safe to try one of them by dismissing the compatibility check?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taras, thanks for your response. Which Add-on are you referring to? One of these?</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/xul-profiler-by-yoono/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/xul-profiler-by-yoono/</a></p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/memory-profiler/" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/memory-profiler/</a></p>
<p>?</p>
<p>Neither of those are marked for compatibility with the version of Aurora I&#8217;m currently using. Is it safe to try one of them by dismissing the compatibility check?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamulos</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35991</link>
		<dc:creator>kamulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ok: Bug 792527, I always remembered reading about it somewhere but could never find a matching bug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok: Bug 792527, I always remembered reading about it somewhere but could never find a matching bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj Mehta</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35990</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kamulos, if you cannot find a bug, file one. the worst thing that can happen is the bug will be marked a duplicate of another.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kamulos, if you cannot find a bug, file one. the worst thing that can happen is the bug will be marked a duplicate of another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamulos</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35989</link>
		<dc:creator>kamulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there work being done on Box Shadows? This seems to be the No.1 reason for slow drawing for me. I occasionally record a profile when scrolling on the page stutters and almost always a box shadow is the culprit (like 718453).

I never found a bug for this... is there one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there work being done on Box Shadows? This seems to be the No.1 reason for slow drawing for me. I occasionally record a profile when scrolling on the page stutters and almost always a box shadow is the culprit (like 718453).</p>
<p>I never found a bug for this&#8230; is there one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayank</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35988</link>
		<dc:creator>mayank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No new updates from the dlbi bug (539356)  since 28 aug.
Is it on hold ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No new updates from the dlbi bug (539356)  since 28 aug.<br />
Is it on hold ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tglek</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/2012/09/18/snappy-in-warsaw-pierogy-fueled-hackfest/comment-page-1/#comment-35987</link>
		<dc:creator>tglek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/tglek/?p=799#comment-35987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pd

Install profiler addon, record a profile, post link to it in a bug. Might be something other than cycle collection, gc causing this problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pd</p>
<p>Install profiler addon, record a profile, post link to it in a bug. Might be something other than cycle collection, gc causing this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
