Why not add pleasurability testing into our usability tests?

Diane Loviglio

2

I just finished reading Aarron Walter’s book entitled Designing for Emotion.  Aarron’s the lead user experience designer for MailChimp.  The book, published by A Book Apart, is a fast and easy read giving tons of examples of websites such as Photojojo, Wufoo and Twitter actually designing for humans.  He remaps Maslow’s Hierarchy to include web user’s needs such as functional, reliable, usable and pleasurable.

One of the tools of a user researcher is usability testing, in which we give a user a task and then observe them as they use the product or service to complete that task.  Essentially, we’re testing how usable the service is, but Aarron challenges us to go farther.  From here on out, whenever you do a usability test, add a few questions to test the pleasurability.  I’m not sure what the metrics for success are for a pleasurability test – I think it depends on the product or service – but we can start with the number of smiles the user makes while completing their task and the number of times we hear “cool – I like that” and “oh that’s awesome”.

2 responses

  1. Jim O’Neill wrote on ::

    Incorporating “pleasurability” as a metric for testing is a great concept; thanks for posting this idea.

    Another excellent book that goes into detail about the psychology behind creating great web experiences is Stephen Anderson’s Seductive Interaction Design — Anderson proposes a very similar hierarchy of web users’ needs. He makes the point (which I’m sure Aarron Walter does as well) that pleasurability is quite different from usability, and the traditional tools and best practices for ensuring good usability aren’t enough to deliver that extra smile or “wow.”

    Speaking of measuring emotions, a colleague sent me a link to this tool recently which purports to do exactly that: http://www.lemtool.com/en/how-does-it-work/

  2. Deedra wrote on ::

    The info on this blog is handy.