Comments on: The new stats pages on AMO http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/the-new-stats-pages-on-amo/ Engineering the web Fri, 17 May 2013 21:43:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Stephanie (Sullivan) Rewis http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/the-new-stats-pages-on-amo/comment-page-1/#comment-213337 Stephanie (Sullivan) Rewis Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:24:23 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/#comment-213337 Nice work! When completed, will there be simpler data shown for users with JS disabled?

]]> By: johnjbarton http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/the-new-stats-pages-on-amo/comment-page-1/#comment-213286 johnjbarton Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:29:08 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/#comment-213286 I hope you wanted some feedback…

First I encourage you to test on a case more challenging the Sync. Firebug’s Stats are a mess and more representative of addons that have been around. But after a while I realized that Change on the addon version lists a lot more choices, including 1.4 that is not picked by default. So I guess the problem is the version selection?

Second the times scale buttons are way too short. 1 year is a good choice, so we can see uptake of version updates and FF version issues. The most important thing I use stats for is to verify that users are getting upgrades.

Third the custom time scale is way too hard to use. Which is why the time scale button choices are important.

Daily Users > By Addon Version gives a table labeled “Application version.”

HTH,
jjb

]]> By: seo sydney http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/the-new-stats-pages-on-amo/comment-page-1/#comment-213277 seo sydney Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:31:05 +0000 http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/09/30/#comment-213277 There is no doubt on mozilla firefox because day by day the user of mozilla increasing.

]]>