<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Perf-O-Matic 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/</link>
	<description>Engineering the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 21:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhelmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-215047</link>
		<dc:creator>rhelmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-215047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@kairo - thanks for the feedback! Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633038]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kairo &#8211; thanks for the feedback! Filed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633038" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633038</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kaiser</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-215040</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-215040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks interesting, but buggy. If I go for custom graphs and try to get something for SeaMonkey, it shows me all those things that we never report as selections, but not those we do, like MaxHeap, malloc leaks, codesize, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks interesting, but buggy. If I go for custom graphs and try to get something for SeaMonkey, it shows me all those things that we never report as selections, but not those we do, like MaxHeap, malloc leaks, codesize, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhelmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-214977</link>
		<dc:creator>rhelmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-214977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mark Finkle - Sure, file a bug here for any requests for changes to the dashboard:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Webtools&amp;component=Graph%20Server&amp;version=2.0

Let us know which of the available tests you&#039;d like to see up there:
http://graphs-stage2.mozilla.org/graph.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark Finkle &#8211; Sure, file a bug here for any requests for changes to the dashboard:<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Webtools&#038;component=Graph%20Server&#038;version=2.0" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Webtools&#038;component=Graph%20Server&#038;version=2.0</a></p>
<p>Let us know which of the available tests you&#8217;d like to see up there:<br />
<a href="http://graphs-stage2.mozilla.org/graph.html" rel="nofollow">http://graphs-stage2.mozilla.org/graph.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhelmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-214976</link>
		<dc:creator>rhelmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-214976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Nadav - For 2.0 (the version in this video), you can find the latest at http://github.com/rhelmer/graphs

Be sure to see the README and INSTALL files, and please let me know if you have any problems installing.

Instructions for the production version (1.0) are here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Perfomatic/Installation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nadav &#8211; For 2.0 (the version in this video), you can find the latest at <a href="http://github.com/rhelmer/graphs" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/rhelmer/graphs</a></p>
<p>Be sure to see the README and INSTALL files, and please let me know if you have any problems installing.</p>
<p>Instructions for the production version (1.0) are here:<br />
<a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Perfomatic/Installation" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Perfomatic/Installation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Finkle</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-214967</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Finkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-214967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is support for Mobile data coming? Should I file a bug?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is support for Mobile data coming? Should I file a bug?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadav</title>
		<link>http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2011/02/04/perfomatic2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-214960</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/?p=1491#comment-214960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perf-o-matic 2.0 looks cool! I love the interface and the graphics. I am sure that this will become an invaluable tool in making Firefox faster. 

At work, I develop a high-performance application which I tune for performance. Can I use Perf-o-matic for tracking performance over time ? How difficult is it to setup and configure perf-o-matic for my needs ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perf-o-matic 2.0 looks cool! I love the interface and the graphics. I am sure that this will become an invaluable tool in making Firefox faster. </p>
<p>At work, I develop a high-performance application which I tune for performance. Can I use Perf-o-matic for tracking performance over time ? How difficult is it to setup and configure perf-o-matic for my needs ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
