Windows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too

handerson

70

For the past eight years, users and developers have enjoyed a Windows platform environment that offered users a choice of browsers to navigate their digital lives.  It wasn’t always that way. Prior to the launch of Firefox in 2004, there was really only one browser for Windows – Internet Explorer. Only IE and Firefox had meaningful market share on the Windows platform from 2005-2009. The choices further increased with the introduction of Chrome, and today users can choose from a wide range of browsers. It’s hard to imagine what it used to be like. Unfortunately, the upcoming release of Windows for the ARM processor architecture and Microsoft’s browser practices regarding Windows 8 Metro signal an unwelcome return to the digital dark ages where users and developers didn’t have browser choices.

It’s reported that Windows RT (the name Microsoft has given to Windows running on the ARM processor)  will have two environments, a Windows Classic environment and a Metro environment for apps. However, Windows on ARM prohibits any browser except for Internet Explorer from running in the privileged “Windows Classic” environment. In practice, this means that only Internet Explorer will be able to perform many of the advanced computing functions vital to modern browsers in terms of speed, stability, and security to which users have grown accustomed. Given that IE can run in Windows on ARM, there is no technical reason to conclude other browsers can’t do the same.

Why does this matter to users? Quite simply because Windows on ARM -as currently designed- restricts user choice, reduces competition and chills innovation.  By allowing only IE to perform the advanced functions of a modern Web browser, third-party browsers are effectively excluded from the platform. This matters for users of today’s tablets and tomorrow’s PCs. While ARM chipsets may be primarily built into phones and tablets today, in the future ARM will be significant on the PC hardware platform as well. These environments currently have intense browser competition that benefits both users and developers. When you expand the view of the PC to cover a much wider range of form factors and designs as Microsoft and others forecast, it’s easy to imagine Windows running on ARM in laptops, tablets, phones, and a whole range of devices. That means users will only have one browser choice whenever there’s a Windows ARM environment.

We encourage Microsoft to remain firm on its user choice principles. Excluding 3rd party browsers contradicts Microsoft’s own published Principles that users and developers have relied upon for years. These principles represented a Microsoft market approach that was both notable and went above and beyond their DOJ antitrust settlement obligations.

Because Windows on ARM relies upon so many traditional Windows assets, including brand, code, footprint, and experience, the decision to exclude other browsers may also have antitrust implications. If Windows on ARM is simply another version of Windows on new hardware, it also runs afoul of the EC browser choice commitments and seems to represent the very behavior the DOJ-Microsoft settlement sought to prohibit.

The prospect that the next generation of Windows on ARM devices would limit users to one browser is untenable and represents a first step toward a new platform lock-in. It doesn’t have to be this way.  In announcing the Windows Principles, Microsoft’s General Counsel, Brad Smith, stated “As creators of an operating system used so widely around the world, we recognize that we have a special responsibility, both to advance innovation and to help preserve competition in the information technology industry.”  We encourage Microsoft to remain firm on its user choice principles and reject the temptation to pursue a closed path. The world doesn’t need another closed proprietary environment and Microsoft has the chance to be so much more.

- Harvey Anderson, Mozilla General Counsel

70 responses

  1. Pingback from Allegations multiply in EU browser probe of Microsoft | Desktops on ::

    [...] the alleged violations, Mozilla has been vocal about the browser choice screen and Windows RT. In a May blog post, Mozilla’s chief counsel, Harvey Anderson, argued that Windows RT should be held to the same [...]

  2. Pingback from Google Readies Chrome for Windows 8 Metro | Tech Chatter on ::

    [...] Metro interface on desktop PCs, Google faces the same Microsoft platform restrictions Mozilla has spoken out against and as of now there will be no version of Chrome for WinRT, the version of Windows 8 designed to [...]

  3. Pingback from Jakobia Nora » Windows 8 on ::

    [...] Ograniczenie instalowanych aplikacji na wersji mobilnej systemu Tak jest, system jest okrajany w wersji mobilnej. Nie będzie można na przykład instalować innych niż Internet Explorer przeglądarek. Kolejny ruch monopolistyczny Microsoftu mający na celu promocję ich przeglądarki, jak i wyszukiwarki Bing.źródeło [...]

  4. Pingback from best iphone and ipad apps, apps for iphone, apps for ipad, apps for mobile devices » Mercury Web Browser Pro – The most advanced browser for iPad and iPhone on ::

    [...] Windows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too [...]

  5. Pingback from Il nuovo Windows penalizza Firefox?, Ultimora Notizie on ::

    [...] anche la vita difficile agli utenti. Sul blog ufficiale di Mozilla, ieri Anderson ha scritto un post accusando Microsoft di aver stabilito limitazioni eccessive per i browser nella propria prossima [...]

  6. Pingback from apple imac | computer laptop reviews, desktop computers, notebook reviews on ::

    [...] Web Browser Market Share, August 2012 UpdateHow Australians use the Internet – 2011 Internet Usage DataChrome, Safari See Browser Market Share Increase Worldwide.Which Internet Browser is BestThe Nielsen Social Media Report Q3 2011 / We Are SocialiPad Rules with 70% Market ShareAndroid, iOS continue their tag-team thrashing of RIM’s market shareCurrent status of the “Browser Wars”The Unevenness of McDonald’s Market DominanceWindows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too [...]

  7. Pingback from Austin Window And What You Should Know on ::

    [...] Wooden Windows – A Royal Touch For Your Home InteriorsWindows that Stay Clean: Replacement Windows for ConnecticutAir Max 2012 Windows in homes can now be upgraded through being framed with wood alone and also bein Microsoft extends Windows Server 2008 support by 18 monthsWindows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too [...]

  8. Pingback from Tanzschuhe on ::

    [...] Verliert Henke Super-Sini?Ein neues LayoutEU-Datenschutzposse: Gute Seiten, schlechte SeitenWindows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice TooMighty Working PowerInformationen über Personen im WWWKollegen aufgepasst: Wer lästert, schadet [...]

  9. Pingback from Versiones Móviles De Windows 8 Solo Permitirían IE | Tecnologia on ::

    [...] RT.La acusación fue realizada por el abogado principal de Mozilla, Harvey Anderson, mediante el blog oficial de Firefox, donde manifestó que “Windows en ARM prohíbe que cualquier otro navegador, [...]

  10. Pingback from Versiones Móviles De Windows 8 Solo Permitirían IE | Eduardo Bleda on ::

    [...] acusación fue realizada por el abogado principal de Mozilla, Harvey Anderson, mediante el blog oficial de Firefox, donde manifestó que “Windows en ARM prohíbe que cualquier otro navegador, [...]

  11. Pingback from Jewelry Beads And Stones on ::

    [...] /* */ Metallica, Linkin Park, A Perfect Circle & More Set For 2013 “Soundwave Festival”Man Van RemovalsNEWS – Slipknot to Return to the Studio Next YearOs 5 ganhadores de loteria mais infelizes do mundoOrange présente la nouvelle Signature #4 Jim Root Terror Head“Pay Attention to What They Tell You to Forget”Man City include Tevez in Prem Lge squad – 247 Nigeria News UpdateArtigos da Semana no TI Especialistas – 05/03/2012Windows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too [...]

  12. Pingback from Surface RT « 網絡述聞 on ::

    [...] Firefox(也給微軟封殺了,永遠不會有,除非微軟改變主意) [...]

  13. Pingback from Mozilla’s Hypocrisy: Apple Can Block Firefox, But Microsoft Can’t | Cross Zone on ::

    [...] anti-trust action against Microsoft in the U.S. and Europe because of the Windows RT restrictions. He writes on the Mozilla blog that Microsoft’s [...]

  14. Pingback from Versiones Móviles De Windows 8 Solo Permitirían IE | Hombre del futuro on ::

    [...] acusación fue realizada por el abogado principal de Mozilla, Harvey Anderson, mediante el blog oficial de Firefox, donde manifestó que “Windows en ARM prohíbe que cualquier otro navegador, [...]

  15. Pingback from Microsoft Needs to Increase Browser Choices on Windows 8 on ::

    [...] “The latest OS has got only Internet Explorer 10 preinstalled. Users are restricted to third party browsers that don’t have the privilege to be accessed on Windows RT (Windows run by ARM processor are known as Windows RT), which will consist of two environments namely Windows Classic Environment and Metro environment for applications.” wrote Mozilla in a recent post. [...]

  16. Pingback from Google Chrome for Windows RT - No, Not Yet! on ::

    [...] Microsoft won’t let Google do so. The guys at Mozilla expressed their concerns too!. Users of Windows RT (ARM) also need choice of browsers! For the past eight years, users and [...]

  17. Pingback from Argentina Seizes 51% of Oil Producer YPF to Stem Imports : completedigitalproducts.com on ::

    [...] Farmers urge Zim ‘sanctions’ to remain over unlawful land grabUpdate: Secret Service Scandal Was Over Prostitute Who Wanted Her $47How to make a blogThe World’s 10 Most Popular Company Facebook PagesWindows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice Too [...]

  18. Pingback from Your Questions About Google Chrome — Psoriatic Arthritis on ::

    [...] Questions About Google Chrome — Psoriatic ArthritisWindows on ARM Users Need Browser Choice TooPsoriatic ArthritisHomePrivacy policyContactSite MapPostsCommentsPsoriatic ArthritisOverview of [...]

  19. Pingback from Why would you want to run a desktop browser on a tablet, anyway? - Guest Bloggers - BrianMadden.com on ::

    [...] developer Mozilla took exception in a company blog post, and Google quickly joined the fray in support of its popular Chrome browser.  Mozilla and [...]

  20. Pingback from Dimmi che browser usi e ti dirò se l’Ue ha già multato Microsoft | Il Serale on ::

    [...] responsabile dell’area legale di Mozilla, già nel maggio 2012 aveva parlato di ritorno agli anni bui dell’era digitale poiché questo sistema operativo non consente l’uso di altro browser all’infuori di Explorer in [...]

More comments: 1 2