July 22nd, 2010
MozillaBuild 1.5 has been released:
The major highlights include:
- A newer Mercurial (1.5.4)
- Support for Visual C++ 2010
- A newer Python (2.6.5)
As usual, bugs can be filed at bugzilla.mozilla.org.
October 5th, 2009
Some time ago, Lukas Blakk implemented support for a source server on our Windows builds as a class project in Dave Humphrey‘s class at Seneca College. Of course, soon after that we switched our main VCS from CVS to Mercurial, which broke all of her hard work. Thankfully, we got another one of Dave’s students, Jesse Valianes, to fix things to make it work with Mercurial. We landed his patch, but as it turns out we never enabled a setting on our build machines to make it actually work. However, when we finally tried to do so, I found out that another patch we had landed in the interim had broken things. I finally landed a fix for that, and we flipped it back on, and so today’s trunk build is source-enabled again.
If you have no idea what any of this means, it means you can download a Windows nightly build, attach a debugger, have it download the debug symbols automatically from our symbol server, and the debugger will download the matching source for you automatically.
I hope to get this backported to our 1.9.2 and 1.9.1 branches ASAP, so that our 3.5.x and 3.6 release builds will be similarly debuggable.
September 17th, 2009
I recently landed some changes (on trunk and 1.9.2) to the way Firefox packaging works. There are two immediate consequences of this you should be aware of:
- Mac builds now use a packaging manifest just like Windows and Linux. If you add a file that you intend to ship on Mac, it needs to wind up in a packaging manifest. (bug 463605)
- All the packaging manifest files have been combined into one single file: browser/installer/package-manifest.in. This should save everyone some time and annoyance. (bug 511642)
These changes had no effect on applications other than Firefox.
February 9th, 2009
The New Yorker has a great article about reforming the US health care system entitled “Getting There from Here.” It’s not terribly long and if you’re at all interested in the topic I’d recommend reading it. It discusses how other nations with universal health care arrived at their present systems, which is a topic that seems completely absent from debate on the subject in the USA. Anyway, I’m not really posting here to talk about health care, but one part of this article rang true with me in other ways:
There is no dry-docking health care for a few months, or even for an afternoon, while we rebuild it. Grand plans admit no possibility of mistakes or failures, or the chance to learn from them. If we get things wrong, people will die. This doesn’t mean that ambitious reform is beyond us. But we have to start with what we have.
As owner of the Mozilla build system, I hear a lot of complaints. This is understandable, our build system is showing its age, and we are certainly straining against the limits of Autoconf and GNU make on a regular basis. Along with complaints, I hear a lot of suggestions of the form “why don’t you just use X“, where X is any of a number of alternative tools such as CMake or SCons. The basic answer parallels the quote above. Because we don’t have time to stop and rewrite everything. Our build system contains tens of thousands of lines of makefiles, as well as a configure.in that’s over 8,000 lines. Converting this much build junk by hand is doomed to failure. Converting it through automated tools might be possible, but we would need a smart plan, and it would likely involve testing the tools in parallel with the existing build system for a while in order to make for a smooth transition. In any case, it’s clear that if we are to find a way forward, it will require building on what we have, and not burning it to the ground and starting over from scratch.
February 6th, 2009
Our Release Engineering group provides a VMWare VM image of the Linux Reference Platform, which is the VM upon which all of the official Linux builds happen. This is very handy, as you can trade some download time (it’s about 1.2 GB) for the time it would take you to install Linux and setup all the build dependencies. I’m currently running Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit on one of my home machines, and I’ve been using VirtualBox for running VMs on the machine because it was super easy to install in Ubuntu (via apt-get). I found out today that VirtualBox can use VMWare disk images, so you can run the Linux Reference Platform VM pretty much out-of-the-box in VirtualBox.
The steps I took were:
- Download the reference platform VM from the link above and unzip it somewhere.
- Run VirtualBox, and go to the “Virtual Disk Manager”. Click “Add”, and browse to the directory where you unzipped the VM. Add “CentOS-5.0-ref-tools-vm.vmdk” and “CentOS-5.0-ref-tools-vm_1.vmdk” to the “Hard Disks” list in the manager, then click “Ok”.
- Click “New” to create a new VM. Name it whatever you want, and select “Linux 2.6” as the OS. Set the base memory size to something usable on your hardware (but not so small that it can’t compile Mozilla). For the “Boot Hard Disk (Primary Master)”, click “Existing…” and select “CentOS-5.0-ref-tools-vm.vmdk”. Click “Ok”, then “Finish”.
- Click on your new VM in the list on the left, and click “Settings”. Click on the “Hard Disks” entry in the list on the left of the Settings dialog. Check “Primary Slave”, click the “Select” button to the right of the drop-down, and choose “CentOS-5.0-ref-tools-vm_1.vmdk”. Click “Ok”.
- You should now be able to click “Start” and see your new VM boot. It will complain about a missing disk for the /builds mount, this is normal and shouldn’t be a problem.
You should read the wiki page linked in the first paragraph, as by default the VM is not configured to boot into X windows, but does provide a VNC Server.