Extensions in Firefox 58

With the release of Firefox Quantum on November 14, 2017, we officially entered a WebExtensions-only world for add-on development. While that event was certainly the news of the day, Firefox 58 quietly entered Beta and a host of new APIs and improvements landed. As always, documentation for the APIs discussed here can be found on MDN Web Docs.

Additional Theme API

The API around themes continues to grow, allowing you customize even more of the browser appearance. In Firefox 58, you can now:

Reader Mode API Added to Tabs

The API available for interacting with tabs continues to grow. Firefox reader view (or reader mode) strips away clutter like buttons, ads and background images, and changes the page’s text size, contrast, and layout for better readability. It can even read the page out loud to you, if you want.

The image below shows a page that can be viewed in reader mode, indicated by the page icon in the URL bar (circled in red).

MDN article in Normal Mode.Clicking on the icon puts the page in reader mode, removing most of the page elements except the text and adding buttons to the left-hand side that modify the reading experience.

MDN article in Reader Mode.This powerful browser feature is now available via the WebExtensions API.

Improved webRequest API

Extensions can now easily get the entire URL ancestor chain, even in an HTTP environment. webRequest.onBeforeRequest() now includes another parameter in its callback object called frameAncestors. This is an array that contains information for each document in the frame hierarchy up to the top-level document.

Additionally, to enable proxy authorization to work smoothly,  webRequest.onAuthRequired() now fires for system events. If an extension has the correct permissions, it will be able to use onAuthRequired to supply credentials for proxy authorization.

Flexible XHR and Fetch Headers

When a content script makes requests using the standard window.XMLHttpRequest or window.fetch() API, the Origin and Referer headers are not set like they would be when requests come from the web page itself. This is often desirable in a cross-domain situation so that the content script does not appear to come from a different domain.

However, some sites only allow XHR and fetch to retrieve content if the correct Referer and Origin headers are set. Starting in Firefox 58, the WebExtensions API permits the use of content.XMLHttpRequest() and content.fetch() to perform requests that look as if they were sent by the web page content itself.

Improved Content Security Policy (CSP) Handling

Work also continues in the WebExtensions CSP area. Starting with Firefox 58, the CSP of a web page does not apply to content inserted by an extension. This allows, for example, the extension to load its own resources into a page.

This is a fairly large effort requiring some substantial architectural work. In Firefox 58, the first part of this work has landed, permitting basic injection of content generated by DOM APIs. There will be follow-ups for parser-generated content and inline stylesheets and scripts.

Setting the Default Search Engine

Using chrome_settings_override, an extension can now install a new default search engine by setting the is_default key to TRUE.  To protect the user, this cannot be done silently and the user will see an additional dialog that prompts them to confirm the change.

Search Engine ConfirmationThe user will also see if their default search engine has been overridden in the Options (about:preferences) page, which is explained in more detail below.

User Notification of Extensions Overrides

As the scope and power of the WebExtensions API increases, it is important to maintain the user’s security and privacy. In addition to the permission dialog that a user sees upon installation, Firefox tries to make sure that users are aware of which parts of the browser are under the control of an extension, and provide a way for them to revert back to default behavior, if desired.

Firefox 58 landed a couple of features in this area. First, when an extension has taken control of the New Tab Page, a notice is shown in Options (about:preferences) along with a button to disable the extension.  This is shown in the screenshot below.

Extension OverridesAlong similar lines, if an extension has set a user’s default search engine, this will be shown on the Options (about:preferences) page.

Extension OverridesOver the next few releases expect to see Firefox show even more areas where an extension is in control of a browser behavior along with options to revert back to a default state.

Additional Privacy Controls

In keeping with Mozilla’s mission to protect an individual’s online security and privacy, two new browser settings related to user privacy are now exposed via the WebExtensions API.  Within privacy.websites, we’ve added:

  • firstPartyIsolate – This preference makes the browser associate all data (including cookies, HSTS data, cached images, and more) for any third party domains with the domain in the address bar.
  • resistFingerprinting – Browser fingerprinting is the practice by which websites collect data associated with the browser or the device it’s running on to personally identify you. This preference makes the browser report spoofed information for data that’s commonly used for fingerprinting.

Browser Action Fixes

A number of changes landed in Firefox 58 that fix issues with Browser Action buttons:

Support for PKCS #11 Security Devices

Firefox supports manual installation of external security devices via a dialog under the Options (about:preferences) screen. Now, WebExtensions includes API support for PKCS #11 security devices. Similar to native messaging and managed storage, a native manifest must be installed outside of an extension before the API become useful.


On Android, users get install-time prompts for WebExtension permissions, but under Firefox 58 they now also get prompts when an extension adds additional permissions at runtime.

Miscellaneous Changes

More to Come

The items above represent some of the bigger changes, but Firefox 58 landed a total of 79 items in the WebExtensions area. Thank you to everyone who had a part in getting Firefox 58 to Beta, especially volunteer contributors apoorvasingh2811, DW-dev, Tom Schuster, Kevin Jones, Ian Moody, Tim Nguyen, Tomislav Jovanovic, Masatoshi Kimura, Wouter Verhelst.

We continue to receive a lot of feedback from developers and, based on that feedback, work is progressing on new features for Firefox 59 and beyond. Expect to see the WebExtensions API improve and grow, particularly in regards to the organization and management of tabs, as well as the theming API. As always, thank you for using Firefox and helping ensure that individuals have the ability to shape the Internet and their own experiences on it.

94 comments on “Extensions in Firefox 58”

  1. Antwan wrote on

    Please re-add support for custom login managers. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106400]

    Who cares about add-ons made to detect if tab is in reader mode…

    1. Marco wrote on

      You can always use a password manager like bitwarden (free open source) or Lastpass (freemium).
      Mozilla has to satisfy as many users as possible. Someone else will care for that tab in reader mode add-on

    2. Jasey DePriest wrote on

      Would KeePass and the Kee add-on satisfy your needs?

      This is the combination that I use.

  2. zakius wrote on

    hope you’ll provide proper mouse gestures API ASAP, using contentscripts for that (especially with these “security limitations’) simply doesn’t work

    and that you’ll provide full Pocket support, since the extension was killed with 57 too

    1. zakius wrote on

      oh, and it would be lovely if we could set order of execution for extensions messing with connections

      1. Ivan wrote on


    2. Mike Conca wrote on

      Since Pocket is now built into Firefox, can you explain your comment “provide full Pocket support.” Is something missing that used to be in the extension?


      1. zakius wrote on

        by full support I mean full support, not mere bookmarklet used to save stuff

  3. NAINSAR ALAM wrote on

    This is awesome browser….

  4. Kjemmo wrote on

    Great to see new APIs, but please include a toolbar API soon. So many legacy add-ons are unable to port to WebExtensions due to the lack of a toolbar API.

    1. Mike Conca wrote on

      Thanks. Toolbars are definitely on our radar. As you mentioned, many legacy extensions made use of them.


      1. Robert Ab wrote on

        Firefox 57 and Quantum are definitely big achievements. But at the same time you destroyed a lot of great addons, like SESSION MANAGER. I am staying with Firefox 56 (or Waterfox) until you will solve the problem (see below). Firefox is going to loose a lot of advanced users.

        Can you prepare APIs needed by developers of Session Manager / Tab Mix Plus (session manager functionality) and other similar extensions to make WebExtensions? Some of those developers stated clearly that they will prepare WebExtension only after all APIs will be prepared by Mozilla. The list of needed APIs:

        Also those session manager extensions could cooperate nicely with FF multi-account containers.

      2. Kjemmo wrote on

        Great. It would be very nice to see a target version before the ESR version is no longer supporting legacy extensions. The sooner the better, so there is also some time to port.

      3. Kees wrote on

        This is a good example of an API which had to be implemented *before* switching of classic XPCOM extension logic. You even acknowledge that many classic extensions make use of them.

        The implementation should not be on the radar, it should have been implemented in Firefox 55 or earlier, and when that turned out to be impossible (e.g. for resource reasons) then a plan B should’ve been implemented. (Where in plan B anything could’ve been possible, from delaying the Quantum upgrade to only disabling the part which is significantly changed internally and has a working WebExtension alternative).

        As above suggestion is not executed the only good step Mozilla can take is to ensure that toolbars are implemented for either Fx59 or Fx60 – it *suprises(!)* mee that it seems that the related bug has not seen action from Mozilla for over 3 months(!). And you are still suprised why there are huge complaints from the (user) community about the way the process around WebExtensions/Fx Quantum is handled?

        1. Robert Ab wrote on

          I agree.
          APIs for all major addons (let say 50) should be ready at least 5-6 months before switching off support for XUL addons.
          Alternatively, FF56 ESR should be introduced with longer support for at least 1 year (until APIs for WE are ready for major addons). That way you could have FF57+ with cutting edge technology allowing to improve support for WE and at the same time support for old XUL addons.

    2. BelFox wrote on

      +1! Very happy to see the WebExtensions API being expanded.

      Thank you Mr. Conca for your continued attention to Firefox’s extensibility. I’d like to see the management allocating more resources to the WebExtensions API development.

      Kind regards

  5. jeff wrote on

    When will Firefox get extension key-remapping like Chrome so users can override suggested_key bindings?

    1. Daniel wrote on

      I agree, this is top priority for the power users that are currently large base of Firefox users.

      1. louiz’ wrote on

        Agreed. Being able to customize most keyboard shortcuts should be the minimal for any browser…

        1. bonor wrote on

          Firefox is failing every update more and more like Opera did 15 years ago! Its a matter of time I will quit using it as most of my IT staff already switch to CHrome

  6. David wrote on

    Great that FF is moving on to the new APIs. But the decision to hack up the addons website seems rather stupid. Instead of migrating old and TB/Seamonkey addons to a new site, why not just open a new site for the new addons? Why break the old stuff when the new stuff is new? Just makes little sense. I am surprised.

  7. Koby wrote on

    PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE add a preference to always open URLs entered in the address bar in a new tab, rather than just using whatever tab happens to be open at the time (and please allow this to happen by default, without using any special key combinations or mouse clicks!).

    1. Slurdge wrote on

      Agree with that one. There is a preference for the search bar, so it doesn’t make much sense not to have it for the url bar. Moreover, it kind of removes the purposes of pinned bars if you happen to type an address in them.

    2. Mike Conca wrote on

      This request has come up several times and is definitely climbing its way on to the WebExtensions API roadmap. No promises around timing, but it is more likely than not to make it into a release.

      1. Daniel wrote on

        Doesn’t need to be a whole API, just a simple preference. Even a about:config switch would be fine.

      2. Jacob Overgaard Madsen wrote on

        I really, really encourage you to implement this feature. For now, it’s the single Tab Mix Plus feature I’m missing. I have used Tab Mix Plus as long as I can remember, and I have always been used to being able to configure, that anything opens in a new tab, including the address bar. And no – please don’t tell me to use Alt+Enter for this. I tried switching to Chrome for a period, but being forced to use some weird extra key combination for something I’ve grown so used to doing just by pressing Enter is just … painful. I skipped Chrome, and now I currently use a combination of Firefox ESR and a Chromium based browser, where this is possible to configure.

        I would really like to encourage you to implement this. As the previous poster mentioned, it could just be an about:config parameter – like this one. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268039

        After I have given Quantum a real spin, I would really like to go back to Firefox, as the speed improvements is quite massive. But this is a deal breaker to me. Please consider adding this as an about:config parameter or API, so we can get Tab Mix Plus back.

        Thanks in advance!

    3. louiz’ wrote on

      Can’t you just use alt+enter every time?

      1. Jacob Overgaard Madsen wrote on

        I’d like to emphasize my point for my above comment on this:

        “And no – please don’t tell me to use Alt+Enter for this. I tried switching to Chrome for a period, but being forced to use some weird extra key combination for something I’ve grown so used to doing just by pressing Enter is just … painful. I skipped Chrome, and now I currently use a combination of Firefox ESR and a Chromium based browser, where this is possible to configure.”

  8. Roman wrote on

    Please provide the ability to control keybindings so I can customize my browser to fit my workflow.

  9. mUmblr wrote on

    Love the new reader mode, love the new speed, love the new Firefox.

  10. Mort wrote on

    Bring back rounded tabs.

    1. Csongor wrote on

      It would be fantastic if tabs could be configured similarly to, or even better: _within_ the themes.

      Somebody may like dark grey tabs and lighter active one, one may see all of them the same color but the active one should be surrounded, and so on.

      Theming the tabs would be awesome.

  11. Michael wrote on

    Please develop an API for Tab Focus on mouseover or hover. It’s for accessibility. Thanks!

  12. Johann wrote on

    Guys, add scrollbars theming or something to change the appearance of it

    1. Ben wrote on

      This please, I want to use the new firefox so bad but the inability to remove or theme scrollbars is killing me.

      1. Mike Conca wrote on

        What aspects of the scrollbars would you like to theme?

        1. Johann wrote on

          The ability to hide it and replace it with a custom one.

          Take Tweetdeck on Chrome for example: https://i.imgur.com/QeIIDch.png

        2. user wrote on


    2. Yvo wrote on

      Untill the grey on grey tiny scroll bar can not be customized into a bigger and colored scrollbar, I will not update from FF56 to any higher version. And that’s period.

  13. Guillaume wrote on

    Awesome news!
    Great to see that you are making progress on Content Security Policy handling

  14. skhan wrote on

    “Expect to see the WebExtensions API improve and grow, particularly in regards to the organization and management of tabs, ” <= We so desperately want this, thanks Mozzies.

  15. Brad wrote on

    Hey. Can’t hide the nav bar in fullscreen on my mac desktops anymore…. perhaps I am just missing something but this is a key aesthetic for me when browsing. Still love Mozilla though. Keep it up.

    1. Anurag wrote on

      +1 for this request.
      Please let user go truly fullscreen.

    2. Mike Conca wrote on

      It looks like this might be a known issue.


  16. plop wrote on

    Still doesn’t support the addons I was using in 56, but its ok because I’ve switched to chrome.

  17. X wrote on

    The last usable version of Firefox is 56 for my usecases. Removing the plugin support was a bad move. I hope someone will fork it at v56 and keep on supporting.

    1. Robert Ab wrote on

      I have the same feeling about that.


    2. Axel wrote on

      There already are two forks: Waterfox (ff56) and Basilisk (ff55-ish).

      The catch is that after the current Firefox ESR runs out, Mozilla probably will (semi)hide or even remove legacy extensions from their addon site, so having a browser that still supports them is just part of the solution. But some authors of “legcy” extensions seem to be willing to continue development even after they are declared dead.

  18. Closer2Chrome wrote on

    Broke all of my themes, half of my extensions/add-ons. I rolled back to 56 and am seriously looking at moving all of my work to Chrome.

    1. Kees wrote on

      Although there is much to criticize about the process, moving to Chrome will not help I’m afraid. AFAIK Chrome has a more limited add-on API already and has a similar theming option.

      On the other hand it would have been better that Mozilla members were using common sense when planning this. The fact that the change over is not scheduled just after and ESR release is just plain stupid. And even after I suggested that Mozilla creates a ‘special’ ESR from Fx 56 they just ignored this.

      Creating Firefox 56 ESR and moving the people using the classic XPCOM based add-ons to this features until either all their add-ons have been converted completely (which implies that the API exists and is complete) or to the next year (when an ESR based on WE only Firefox is released) would have given Mozilla 1 year to implement missing features without a bat user experience to those users…

      1. zakius wrote on

        in my case I got a reply, or even few of them

        all saying “you have no idea what ESR is”

      2. Axel wrote on

        Not creating a Firefox 56 ESR was a big mistake, no matter how much abandoning the legacy extensions was inevitable. It seemed Mozilla wants to make the past forgotten asap, and a legacy ESR release would mean presenting all the legcy addons on the site for a longer tme.

        Now Mozilla rushes to create new api hooks to replace lost functionality by neutered webextension ports of legacy addons – but in the meantime many users will jump ship to Chrome or user-friendly Chrome derivatives like Vivaldi.

        But hope dies last, eventually Mozilla might branch a Firefox 56 ESR and use the time gained to create apis for more popular legacy addon features.

  19. Kees wrote on

    Although it may be helpful to have an API related to the reader mode, the priority Has To Be the API-s used by the classic add-ons. It would be helpful for everyone if Mozilla starts planning features and make these plans public. Just do a strict planning (like is done with killing the classic XPCOM add-on API), so that people who’ve been using add-ons which no longer works due to missing APIs know when to expect the functionality back as a supported API – of course add-on authors need to update their add-ons as well, but without the API in the first place they cannot do anything.

    The planning should allow for all classic functionality* to be implemented within 1 year, starting with the most used functionality in the past. (I.e. the top 25 add-ons should be available again *WITHOUT* compromise within 3 months), the top 50 in 6 months and the top 100+ in one year.

    *: Before creating a list of top-xx add-ons obvious legacy add-ons (like Firebug) and theme related add-ons (including those who did have an impact on the UI which Mozilla no longer wants to support/allow) should be removed from the list.

    Just to give an example of an add-on which did have a proper user experience, but due to the limited functionality of WE no longer has a correct UX: Tile Tabs did work fine using the classic XPCOM API – now using WE it is barely usable.

    1. Mike wrote on

      Firebug is dead my friend, better start liking the native debugger. 🙁

  20. Jack wrote on

    Lots of suggestions here. Here’s mine: Offline mode for WebExtensions 🙂

    1. Jack wrote on

      Wait. It is probably better to have granular control over all WebExtension permissions instead.

  21. Tee Pearson wrote on

    Please fix add-ons. I miss Net Video Hunter!

  22. Uristqwerty wrote on

    Perfect is the opposite of done, and the quest for API perfection has left a multi-month gap where a large variety of extensions are not possible. I wish there could have been a set of good-enough transition APIs, with plenty of warnings to developers and even users, to be phased out as the proper APIs are added.

    Filesystem access (hey! without that, each extension will need to create a file manager UI on top of available storage APIs and train users! It won’t automatically have familiarity, internationalization, or interoperability effectively for free!), low-level networking, being able to hide tabs…

    Worse, at least two of the bugs for such features have disabled comments, effectively the ultimate statement of “wait for it, and accept whatever we give you” to users and extension developers.

    The progress that *is* being made is fantastic, I just wish that this ravine of incompatibility never made it to release, much less beta.

  23. Robert Ab wrote on

    Session Manager stopped working in FF57. Can you incorporate functions of this addon directly into Firefox? Maybe with connection to Firefox Multi-Account Containers?
    Alternatively, can you create missing APIs required by Session Manager (APIs needed — bugs @ bugzilla: 1378647 (unassigned), 1378651 (unassigned), 1381922 (unassigned), 1284886 (solved), 1322060 (solved), 1322485 (solved)).
    Firefox 57 and Quantum are definitely big achievements. But at the same time you destroyed a lot of great addons, like SESSION MANAGER / TAB MIX PLUS. I am staying with Firefox 56 (or Waterfox) until you will solve the problem. Firefox is going to loose a lot of advanced users.

  24. gainup wrote on

    Developers can’t migrate to new WebExtension untill you give them tools to do it. For example silent printing and set printer on fly were unique features for firefox and disabling that was huge mistake.

  25. cool dude wrote on

    How come you won’t fix this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1409675

    Why do you think regressions and breaking things is okay, and even worse than that, somehow not fixing it is fine too?

  26. Kyo wrote on

    I’m very glad to see the continued development of APIs for Quantum and beyond. There are multiple Legacy addons I have that cannot be upgraded to WebExtensions because as of now there is no API for their functionality. I would consider it a significant priority that Mozilla please attempt to develop these APIs ASAP, so that users can have a better experience.

    For instance, we need a secure way for extensions to work with the password database. I’m very glad that KeeFox works (a massively important addon for those who use Keepass databases instead), but say “Password Exporter” which allows users to back up their Firefox Password Database by exporting it into .csv / .xml etc…. is not possible thanks to lack of API. Ideally, it would be nice if Firefox not only offered an API for this, but included a native way to export to file in both encrypted and plain text formats.

    I’m glad to see the theming engine getting an extension to its API, but please please add a function in 58 or beyond that allows for the generation of new “bars” as part of a theme or addon. For instance, I’m a fan of “Download Status Bar” or “Download Manager (S3) ” legacy addons which showcase downloads as little ‘blocks” on a special bar as well as offering other functionality, but they cannot be updated to work with FF Quantum because of a lack of API! Likewise, “The Addon Bar Restored” was a fantastic legacy extension for those with lots of addons, allowing users a separate bar like pre-Australis themes for their addon icons, in addition to the normal space where they reside currently. Without that API, this can’t be added. Though honestly, I’d be appreciative if it could be added as a native feature of FF Quantum under “Bars” when in Customize mode – the ability to spawn an extra bar to put additional functions of any sort should be built in!

    While we’re talking of downloading , we need API extensions for this as well. Addons such as “DownThemAll” and “FlashGot” aren’t working at all at the moment, and “Video Download Helper” has to resort to using a separate, local program as a workaround. Please give us powerful downloading addons again!

    Lastly, I’ve also noticed that we’re lacking addons regarding privacy and security functions. “Privacy Settings” , a now-Legacy addon that would explain and give the option to modify certain about:config variables from a addon icon w/drop down menu, is not able to work because of lacking APIs to do so. Likewise, the very useful “Private Tab” would allow users to load a single tab in Private mode instead of needing a whole different window. It too cannot work thanks to limited API dealing with tabs and privacy/private mode functions. This too sounds like something that could be built in to Firefox though – I understand the rationale for requiring a separate Private window, but especially with your new Container Tabs, I don’t see any problem with allowing users to enable Private tabs in the Settings menu after a warning telling them to pay attention etc.

    Oh and regarding Container Tabs, if the functionality is built in to FF57 now, it seems like the “Multi-Account Containers” extension should either be installed by default and/or easy to get with a link from the settings menu – especially if one of your other addons requires the container tabs feature be checked. Otherwise, users can see options for Containers but have no way to actually spawn them or even know exactly how they work. I know that right now the walk through is built into the addon and that’s fine, but just give people a direct link to the AMO installer page next to “Learn More” (which by the way is still talking about containers as if its part of Test Pilot; I’;m sure this will be updated).

    I have long supported Firefox because of Mozilla’s stance on privacy and open source on the web, making FF the biggest and best supported “noob to guru useful”, extensible, open source, multi-platform (Linux preferring user here!), browser around. Quantum is a great step forward and I know there will be some adaptation and kinks to work out, but these API improvements to replicate some features from the XUL days are important to showcase Firefox’s benefits and keep older users on the platform – where frankly, some have gotten annoyed that these APIs were not present by Quantum launch, cutting off their main reason for sticking to the browser when Legacy APIs were no longer available.

    We also need to keep going with new and better features ( per-tab or per window sandboxing ?) etc… because it will be hard for Firefox to pull though on ideology alone if users feel that Chrome or others offer better features; we need to be open and ethical, without giving up functionality; Please keep pushing onward!

    P.S. – Thunderbird needs a Quantum upgrade, not just aesthetically but in terms of functions too! I’d love to see functionality added to enable full, encrypted connection to those like ProtonMail and Tutanota that run OpenPGP/GnuPG style encryption in the browser. Right now, using IMAP is less secure and leaks metadata, so working on an open method of giving parity security, be it built in or extension, would be a big feature. Likewise, support for Gmail style Mailboxes/filtering besides just additional folders etc. How about namedropping NextCloud and checking up on WebDAV support? Thunderbird is a great program that deserves a Quantum upgrade and a full, modern revival to become a fantastic PIM/communications platform!

    1. jim wrote on

      Yeah, nice how they broke VDH and a bunch of other nice add-on’s. Makes my job take 3 times as long now. I rolled back to the older version 52 and changed my update preferences. I won’t auto update now until I review the notes and user responses. This last update basically ruined my productivity in Firefox and that is completely unacceptable. Mozilla broke 85% of the add-on’s I use so good job in the QA department boys. What good is Quantum when you lost all the nice things that make it a useful tool? Exactly.

  27. MR Vancouver wrote on

    Right now 12 out of 17 very useful extensions are going away. Not a happy transition thus far.

  28. Worldsdream wrote on

    If the API does not get better so the devs can make great addons or port their legacy addons, it will be very bad. I really mean that. I always talked very good and it was deep out of my heart for firefox. Firefox WAS great because of their addons. I have addons that are legacy and the devs can’t port it because of the limitation in the API. Yes, I already talked with them. They even are putting it on the addons page. It’s firefox fault!

    I still miss a new tab icon, can you please push that back. If users want it, they can move it to their bar. If not, it will stay in the hidden section.

    Addons that are legacy and can’t port because of API:
    Open download, who does not want to run applications or pdf files without saving them?!
    Download manager: who does not want to be in control of their speed and how far the download is, just in their status bar?
    Double click close tab: why do we have to go to the close button and close it?

    Well to bad. I hope they really care about me as a loyal user and all the others.

  29. Tom wrote on

    I’m just not seeing the so called speed improvement with FF 57 everyone is talking about. It is certainly no faster than FF 56.0. When I install the proper ublock origin (1.14.8) in FF 57, the browser slows down even more by a second or two at least on startups to homepage and because of this FF 57 is the slowest browser I have tried.

    Palemoon, IE 11 and FF 56+ all load faster to homepage for me than FF 57. With PM and FF 56 – this is when using the older ublock origin non webextension version – which has no effect on browser speed (other than perhaps speeding it up) esp launch. The newer UO web extension seems to slow the browser (FF56 and FF57) a little. Is that a web extension technology issue?

    Additionally, FF 57 seems to use more memory and cpu, not less. FF wise, I’m sticking with FF 56.0 for now. I use it with two legacy extensions which kills electrolysis and the processes by default and keeps my cpu fan calm. Also using Palemoon which is much faster then FF 57 realworld and Chrome as a distant backup. Chrome in my experience (and also according to recent reviews) is also just generally faster than FF 57.

  30. a_FF_ESR_user wrote on

    When I need to use Firefox, I am stuck with 52 ESR, since Classic Theme Restorer does not have APIs to fix the latest UI changes —useless from my point of view—

    In particular I would like to see APIs that would allow to:
    – Have Tabs on bottom
    – In the awesome bar, go back to pre- FF48 double line autocomplete results and getting rid of the annoying ‘visit’ link in the suggestions.

    In the mean time, Safari has become my main browser; since version 11,it is getting pretty good

  31. Shawn wrote on

    I have updated to the latest version, like the new version but it’s become nightmare, how can i roll back to older version, new version is extremely slow on response, if i need click on a link it doesn’t give me the indication that i am about click on, scrolling the browser up and down terrible, now everything become snail process on the Firefox quantum, by the way i am using windows 10 with boot camp. i had reinstalled but no improvement. can someone fix it greatly appreciated.

  32. D wrote on

    Jack wrote on November 21, 2017 at 2:32 pm:

    Lots of suggestions here. Here’s mine: Offline mode for WebExtensions

    +1 I really need a button to switch offline
    or please add it as a command in the developers toolbar

  33. Homer Simpson wrote on

    I would like to have buttons +text as was available in the olden days natively, or using Classic Theme Restorer prior to FF 57.

  34. Gopal wrote on

    Sorry … but none of these new features is attractive enough for me if it means it will break most of my current add-ons. My firefox keeps prompting me to upgrade … but I just click the “Not Now” button.

  35. B wrote on

    Why did you make FF57 WebExtensions-only when that API is not even remotely feature complete? You are talking about adding more support in FF58 and even FF59? What kind of way is this to manage a project?

  36. Alex wrote on

    Please develop webextension apis to such an extent that a legacy extension shim can be written in it to provide 100% portability to legacy extensions. I wont be updating to 57 until that is possible and done.

    If i wanted to use chrome, I would use chrome. Stop making a crappier version of chrome and make a better version of Firefox.

  37. ulf3000 wrote on

    APIs i need to port my addons :

    -left right and middle click seperation for action buttons, so they can do different stuff with one button very easily

    -custom button , in the sdk buttons i can just go into the buttons add a few div´s and text or whatever and make my own button more usefull with more information( my button begins to blink with the new ip if it changes) but you could also display downloadspeeds or whatever directly in the addon bar

    – css styles for tab background and text which can be triggered individually for each tab and can also be saved together with the session data

    Also please add a
    DEDICATED ADDONBAR , switch it on in the preferences or something , the small bar beside the url bar IS OBVIOUSLY NOT ABLE TO HANDLE 20 or 30 addons , thsi is such a nobrainer

  38. Michael Martens wrote on

    I think I’m going to switch to chrome. Who knows what stupid ideas will come up in the future. I wasted so much time, reading, waiting, installing, trying. At least this will be over with chrome.

  39. Yclept Nemo wrote on

    I’m curious if there is an API planned to control new tab placement. Many great addons (tree style tab, tab deque, vimium) move the tab *after* it has been created. This is distracting and slow.

    I’m also curious if there is a specific web extension API to allow hooks into desktop [password] keychain services.

    I also gather that a session manager API (batch tab operations) won’t make the cut for FF58?

    1. Mike Conca wrote on

      A tab placement API is being worked on right now. It won’t make it for 58, but should appear shortly afterward. Hooks into the keychain service are under discussion (primarily for security review), and session manager API are on the roadmap.

      1. Yclept Nemo wrote on

        Thanks for the response!

      2. Axel wrote on

        Are hooks for reviving “Mozilla Archive Format” being worked on, too? Even Chrome supports .mht, and the .maff format was propagated for a long time by Mozilla themselves (hence the name). It would be nice if Mozilla would show some faith and acknowledge that abandoning users’ archived data was a bit premature.

        The “Save Page WE” is not replacement or viable alternative as it cannot save the full page in many case, and it produces large files that can only contain a single page.

  40. Arny wrote on

    Please improve support for user security & privacy. In particular, improve extension Design Guidelines by requiring WebExtension developers to design extensions in a modular way aiming for most of now required Permissions converted to Optional, thus revocable by users after install. Also, expose a list of current permissions in Extension Details on Add-ons page, and update GUI allowing to revoke optional permissions on that page. Advice developers to provide detail description in Help or on Details page, what features are enabled by each permission separately, and will be disabled if revoked. Extremely important: provide browser users with a way to promptly disable any extension on certain websites that require more privacy, such as banking websites. The easiest way to do it is adding “Disable in Tab” or “Disable on Domain” browser (not extension) controlled option to RMC Menu of each extension button placed on the browser toolbar. Currently users must open Add-ons page to access global Disable Extension option, which is extremely inconvenient, when several Tabs are open, and some require more privacy than other. That would allow to stop input monitoring by extensions on sensitive pages regardless of developer desire, so browser behavior control would be returned to its user as it should be.

    1. n8v8r wrote on

      Points well raised, concur with the aspects of extension scrutiny and safety. It would be handy to combine with the container feature, such as an option set to disable extensions on containers used for banking.

      Also the extension permissions should not just show once during installation but should be permanent display in the details of the extension listing

    2. Rick G wrote on

      It should not be a big effort to design an option to disable extensions in private mode, like Chrome does for incognito. the lack of such option is rather astonishing for FF

  41. Axel wrote on

    That sounds terific, but how far can we trust Mozilla to stay on this path – and support the transition of legacy extensions by adding we apis?

    To have a jolly good laugh, read this quote from one from Bill McCloskey, assuring the public that Mozilla doesn’t intend to buld a wall: https://billmccloskey.wordpress.com/2013/12/05/multiprocess-firefox/#addons

    “The most important thing I want to emphasize is that we intend to go to great lengths to ensure compatibility with add-ons. We realize that add-ons are extremely important to Firefox users, and we have no intention of abandoning or disrupting add-ons”

    … which was shortly before it was announced that all legacy extensions would be abandoned. But what about FEBE, S3 Download Manager, Classic Theme Restorer, Tab Mix Plus, … ? What takes the cake is dropping MHT/MAFF without any replacement, making libraries of saved websites inaccessible.

  42. Jan W. wrote on

    Firefox 58 breaks an add-on that I absolutely depend on in everyday life (Rikaisama, the Japanese-English translation add-on). I won’t be upgrading until this is fixed.

  43. Oliver wrote on

    Firefox 57 on xubuntu broke the previously working integration with the gnome keyring by not providing the required API. That is an enormous usability lapse. I did switch to Chromium, which was easy before the upgrade to Firefox 57, since it automatically imported all login credentials and did store it in the keyring.

    It is totally incomprehensible to me how Mozilla did not address such a key topic as credential storage in a user friendly manner (which is exactly what keyrings provide) before making the existing add-ons that accomplish this unusable. Instead, they focused on totally secondary topics like another screenshooter.

    One lost user here who used Firefox happily before for ages. Only positive point is that it made me realize Chromium is doing all I need seamlessly.

  44. Andreas wrote on

    At work, I have to change my password regularly. Since this domain password is used on about 30 pages, I used “Saved Passwords Editor”, which allowed me to update all of these logins at once.

    Unfortunately, this addon has stopped working now. Migrating to another password editor (e.g. lastpass) is also not an option, since there are no tools available, that can access the passwords from the current store.

    So I can choose between editing all 30 domain-logins manually each month, or copying all of my logins manually to some other password manager.

    1. Tom Hughes wrote on

      Saved Password Editor is the thing I’m missing most as well and I thought FF58 was supposed to bring the necessary APIs for it but I don’t see any mention of them here 🙁

  45. Jasey DePriest wrote on

    Extensions that manage proxy settings cannot support PAC files or other automatic configuration options.

    This is important for my day-to-day work.

  46. n8v8r wrote on

    By the look of unattended a/o long standing bugs in Bugzilla and bogged down developers it appears that M has not the necessary interest/focus/resources on WE but is rather keen to make good on the mainstream market.

    It does not seem that they are bothered by losing few from the advanced user crowd, which likely will be offset easily in the mainstream market. In the end FF is not an idealistic project but a commercial machine that needs to feed some bread winners.

    Maybe the Vivaldi crew will make a difference, at least they give a try as it can be expected from a new entry. Paying attention to details such as coherent colour themes and not like FF with a dark lwt shell that opens than to a blinding interior.

  47. Ben Basson wrote on

    With respect, many add-on authors have asked for many APIs to be added to WebExtensions over the last 12+ months and while I appreciate Mozilla can’t implement all of it, much of it hasn’t even been triaged for approval.

    Could this please be prioritised so that potential contributors at least know where they stand? Nobody is going to volunteer code that could be later veto’d at the policy level (for what often seems like arbitrary reasons).

    In fact, that reminds me. Could you (the “royal you”, meaning Mozilla people with influence) please stop knee-jerk WONTFIXing bugs that are entirely reasonable requests, due to (essentially) technical concerns that could be properly discussed?

    Again, I appreciate that Mozilla can’t implement everything, but shutting down requests without debating possible implementation options that might address technical or security concerns is a) childish and b) counter productive if you’re trying to maintain any semblance of an add-on community.

  48. Tom B wrote on

    i stopped using firefox after tiletabs add-on failed to work. also, in my previous experience, if one tab freezes with memory issues all tabs are frozen. the latter wasn’t a big deal since i could always do the memory intensive work in chrome, but tiletabs breaking was a deal breaker. would be good to know if functionalities like tiletabs will ever come back to Firefox. thanks.

  49. Mark Thomas wrote on

    Why did Session Manager disappear in the latest version. It was a fantastic extension – very helpful… is it coming back?

  50. Mark Thomas wrote on

    Will you be fixing the queue limitations on Video Downloadhelper anytime soon? I used to be able to queue downloads and set a destination at that time and they would just auto start when the queue got to them – now with any queued downloads above the number of allowed simultaneous downloads you can’t set a destination – and have to rely on you being there to set a destination and start them when the slot opens up and the destination dialogue box appears – frustrating!

More comments:1 2