Web technology moves quickly, and we at Mozilla do our best to balance our values of keeping users safe and secure with also ensuring that we are giving users the ability to make choices about the software on their computers. We can’t keep up with the cost of providing security updates to older versions forever, though, so we’ll often try to encourage users to migrate to the latest version. A few weeks ago, we made another such offer to our Firefox 3 users, explaining that we were not planning on supporting that release anymore and asking them to upgrade to Firefox 3.6:
In the past, soliciting feedback from users has helped us understand why users were opting to not upgrade, so this time around, people who clicked on the “No thanks” option above were directed to a survey. Over 40,000 people were kind enough to share their thoughts with us.
So what do the results look like this time?
Let’s start by taking a look at responses to the first question:
Over half of the respondents stated that they were simply content with Firefox 3. And compared to what we saw last survey, far fewer users selected “Other reason.” Still, a quarter of users took the time to give an alternative explanation, so exploring these answers can definitely help us gain additional insight. A list of the most common phrases entered into the “Other reason” text field is presented below:
Two things immediately jump out:
- First, confusion over cost has virtually disappeared — this had been a problem previously.
- Second, the vast majority of comments are now about a lack of time.
The lack of comments about costs is a pleasant surprise. Acting on feedback from the last survey, we revised the update prompt, highlighting that the upgrade is free in two places. It seems that this simple addition was enough to eliminate most of the confusion.
The update prompt itself may also partly account for the rise in “no time” comments. With prior upgrade initiatives, users saw an advertisement and button similar to what you see below:
Users could then click “Get the new version” to initiate a 30-second update procedure. This time, however, instead of seeing a typical software dialog box, people encountered the update prompt via the Firefox “Whats new” page and were presented with the customary green Firefox download button. Hitting the button also initiated the update, but via the more involved process of downloading and installing a fresh version of the browser.
Pushing out the update in this way was a one-time situation, and we’ll revert to the usual process and software dialog box in the future. To alleviate this issue further, we should also perhaps add to the prompt some indication that updating Firefox is relatively quick and painless.
Next, lets turn to Question 2. This was a free form text box so we manually read through a random sample of 10% of the responses and parsed them into categories.
Firefox 3.6’s compatibility, both with add-ons and with specific websites/applications, remains a key issue (although user perception might be playing a small role as well). On the other hand, general stability and performance issues are cited considerably less often: crash and speed comments together account for 11% of responses, down from the 25% we saw last survey.
Our two main insights from above are also evident here. Cost comments have essentially disappeared from Question 2 as well, although they previously made up 7% of responses. And again, time concerns have become a real sticking point for users.
The rise of these “no time” responses, coupled with the still considerable “too many updates” category, has triggered suggestions that extend beyond prompt and wording revisions. For example, some propose that updates occur automatically in the background unbeknownst to the user (à la chrome), perhaps with an easy option to downgrade (unlike chrome).
Clearly, we are a long ways from making any major changes to the update process, but we’d love to hear your thoughts on any of this!
alanjstr
wrote on
:
Dan
wrote on
:
Brian P.
wrote on
:
Kyle Huey
wrote on
:
Michael Lefevre
wrote on
:
SilverWave
wrote on
:
Kizza
wrote on
:
Kurt (supernova_00)
wrote on
:
johnjbarton
wrote on
:
Justin L.
wrote on
:
Ian M
wrote on
:
Tiago Sá
wrote on
:
Mircea
wrote on
:
Scott Rubin
wrote on
:
Christopher Jung
wrote on
:
Firefox Advocate
wrote on
:
Gabe
wrote on
:
rossy
wrote on
:
steve
wrote on
:
Merk
wrote on
:
Ben McCann
wrote on
:
cgt
wrote on
:
Anon
wrote on
:
Marco
wrote on
:
jeffrey
wrote on
:
BiK
wrote on
:
steve
wrote on
:
Scott Klement
wrote on
:
Dan
wrote on
:
Detrus
wrote on
:
Dhruv Mittal
wrote on
:
jc
wrote on
:
Mia Junk
wrote on
:
Firefox Advocate
wrote on
:
Raspy
wrote on
:
Color Management
wrote on
:
Lucas
wrote on
:
dan
wrote on
:
Alan
wrote on
:
another_sam
wrote on
:
another_sam
wrote on
:
J. Couprie
wrote on
:
Ale
wrote on
:
Alex
wrote on
:
Hunnter
wrote on
:
Marvin
wrote on
:
Don
wrote on
:
jojo
wrote on
:
Ed
wrote on
:
pheldespat
wrote on
: