Evolving the Firefox Brand

Say “Firefox” and most people think of a web browser on their laptop or phone, period. TL;DR, there’s more to the story now, and our branding needs to evolve.

With the rapid evolution of the internet, people need new tools to make the most of it. So Firefox is creating new types of browsers and a range of new apps and services with the internet as the platform. From easy screen-shotting and file sharing to innovative ways to access the internet using voice and virtual reality, these tools will help people be more efficient, safer, and in control of their time online. Firefox is where purpose meets performance.

Firefox Quantum Browser Icon

As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family. Recoloring that logo or dissecting the fox could only take us so far. We needed to start from a new place.

A team made up of product and brand designers at Mozilla has begun imagining a new system to embrace all of the Firefox products in the pipeline and those still in the minds of our Emerging Technologies group. Working across traditional silos, we’re designing a system that can guide people smoothly from our marketing to our in-product experiences.

Today, we’re sharing our two design system approaches to ask for your feedback.

 

How this works.

For those who recall the Open Design process we used to craft our Mozilla brand identity, our approach here will feel familiar:

  • We are not crowdsourcing the answer.
  • There’ll be no voting.
  • No one is being asked to design anything for free.

Living by our open-source values of transparency and participation, we’re reaching out to our community to learn what people think. You can make your views known by commenting on this blog post below.

Extreme caveat: Although the products and projects are real, these design systems are still a work of fiction. Icons are not final. Each individual icon will undergo several rounds of refinement, or may change entirely, between now and their respective product launches. Our focus at this point is on the system.

We’ll be using these criteria to evaluate the work:

  • Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
  • How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
  • Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
  • Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
  • Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?

All the details.

The brand architecture for both systems is made up of four levels.

Each system leads with a new Firefox masterbrand icon — an umbrella under which our product lines will live.

The masterbrand icon will show up in our marketing, at events, in co-branding with partners, and in places like the Google Play store where our products can be found. Who knows? Someday this icon may be what people think of when they hear the word “Firefox.”

At the general-purpose browser level, we’re proposing to update our Firefox Quantum desktop icon. We continue to simplify and modernize this icon, and people who use Firefox tell us they love it. Firefox Developer Edition and Firefox Nightly are rendered as color variants of the Quantum icon.


Browsers with a singular focus, such as our Firefox Reality browser for VR applications and our privacy-driven Firefox Focus mobile browser, share a common design approach for their icons. These are meant to relate most directly to the master brand as peers to the Firefox Quantum browser icon.

Finally, the icons for new applications and services signal the unique function of each product. Color and graphic treatment unite them and connect them to the master brand. Each icon shape is one of a kind, allowing people to distinguish among choices seen side by side on a screen.

Still in the works are explorations of typography, graphic patterns, motion, naming, events, partnerships, and other elements of the system that, used together with consistency in the product, will form the total brand experience.

Read along as we refine our final system over the next few months. What we roll out will be based on the feedback we receive here, insights we’re gathering from formal user testing, and our product knowledge and design sensibilities.

With your input, we’ll have a final system that will make a Firefox product recognizable out in the world even if a fox is nowhere in sight. And we’ll deliver a consistent experience from an advertisement to a button on a web page. Thanks for joining us on this new journey.

Madhava Enros, Sr. Director, Firefox User Experience

Tim Murray, Creative Director, Mozilla

2,212 comments on “Evolving the Firefox Brand”

  1. Federico wrote on

    I love system 1 icons

  2. Arpana wrote on

    I like the System 1 the most.
    It’s look Modern & Dynamic.

  3. Classic wrote on

    System 1 better.

  4. Roman wrote on

    System 2

  5. Christian Beckstein wrote on

    Masterbrand (icon)
    From a branding perspective, including the idea/name of the browser is fire+fox one might see System 1 representing the “fox” and System 2 the “fire” as basis for future design evolutions, i would recommend focusing on the “fox” for the brand/enterprise as it seems to be the stronger emotional hook.

    Browser Icon
    From a visual perspective i am more attracted by the design System 2. At least the browser-icon of System 2 does look more lively and intuitive correct as System 1.

    Singularly Used Browser-Functional icons
    Both versions work. If used within the browser for the identification of functionalities i would definitely use one-coloured icons instead of the coloured ones.

    Additional Apps/Start-Icons:
    Both Systems “work”. But both lack the cuteness of the origin fox – and seems to be the unemotional/technical derivation of “create some more icons based on the design” instead of “creating powerful app-icons that are in line with the brand idea of the firefox and add to the brand story”.

    Thanks for sharing your ideas.

  6. mateusz wrote on

    1

  7. Harut wrote on

    I like the 2 system

  8. Harut wrote on

    System 2

  9. Adnan wrote on

    System 2

  10. Mischa wrote on

    I much prefer the 2nd option because it’s more cutting edge in general than the 1st one where the 1st one has a standard approch.

  11. Lisa wrote on

    I absolutely agree with Tyler! I would also prefer system 1, with the browser icons from system 2 :)

  12. garrigues wrote on

    Hello
    In my point of view ,I’d prefer the system 2 more friendly.

  13. Trstn wrote on

    I absolutely love the design of the System 1 masterbrand logo. I do agree with many others that it looks too much like the gitlab logo. I think that could be fixed with a bit of colouring though. I think it’d look great with some of the nightly colours.

    For the browser logos, I love all of them, but definitely love the System 2 versions more.

    For the rest, System 1 is definitely superior.

  14. rattapol wrote on

    System 1 icons with System 2 Browser icons.

  15. Igor wrote on

    I prefer System 2. It’s more minimalistic and has older design elements which are known by many users of Mozilla

  16. Sam wrote on

    System 1 Masthead and General-purpose browser icon but with system 2 icons for singularly-focused, icons, apps and services. The only thing for me that feels a little disconnected is the magenta to purple gradient on the asterisk icon of system 2. It stands apart from the rest of the colorways but would pair nicely if it sat in a set with the system 1 General-purpose browser icons.

  17. Jaroslaw wrote on

    System 1 is better, but the masterbrand icon from system 2 is the best.

  18. Malik D. wrote on

    Masterbrand icon #1 definitely feels a lot more like Firefox than icon #2. Other than that, system #2 has much more distinguishable icons. The different colors and shapes definitely make each one more identifiable.

  19. David Pecheniy wrote on

    System 1 amazing

  20. Karma wrote on

    I really like both the Masterbrand icons. System 1 feels more modern. System 2 is more nostalgic. I think most people would relate to System 1.

    For the General-purpose browser icons, I have a strong preference for System 2. Keep the negative space.

    The singularly-focused browser icons & the new app icons have solid designs. Both systems are good. No preference.

  21. taikedz wrote on

    I’m more of a fan of iterating on icon designs than completely changing them outright, so that’s one reason I’d vote for system 2’s main icon.

    The other reason is that System 1’s icon is just too similar to Gitlab’s icon, it could nearly be grounds for a trademark dispute…

    That said, I prefer the aesthetics of the rest of the iconset from System 1, and they aren’t in total conflict with the primary logo of Sys2. I’m not a fan of leaving the blue disc inside the foxes though.

    My 2c for your penny.

  22. Karma wrote on

    Correction: System 1 masterbrand logo looks too much like Gitlab’s logo. Go with System 2.

  23. Adam Simon wrote on

    The first one is too similar to gitlab’s logo. I love the icons on the system one, they looks special. For the main logo you should work on the system 2nd variant rather than the first.

  24. Duncan MacLeod wrote on

    System 2

  25. Aman wrote on

    I like the current Firefox Quantum logo the best. I will say don’t change it.
    And these both System1 and System2 icons look a lot CHILDISH and very Chinese-OEM like.

  26. stripTM wrote on

    Great job, system 1 makes me feel “solid”, system 2 with so many lines I think it can be confusing.

  27. Jaspa wrote on

    The master logo 1 represents the word “Firefox” better, but it somehow looks aggressive. I wouldn’t feel welcomed and comfortable using/participating in it.

    In general, I like the smoothness of system 2 better. System 1 has the better colour choices and is more simplistic, hence more modern. A mix of both worlds might be the way.

  28. M Dekker wrote on

    Both 1 and 2 are completely awful. A cheap throwaway plastic look.

    This “change for the sake of change” thing is a cancer. Stop this rebranding nonsense, and in general stop trying to fix what isn’t broken.

  29. Maksim wrote on

    System 2

  30. Steven Tu wrote on

    The second master logo is iconic – the sweeping fox tail is the groundwork of the firefox brand. Don’t lose that.

  31. west wrote on

    system 1 app icons look too similar, would be easy to confuse them at a glance.

  32. Michael wrote on

    I feel System 1 fits the ‘new’ Firefox brand a lot better. To me, it links to the brand image that Firefox is currently trying to convey. Maybe use the General-purpose browser icons of System 2, though.

  33. Silv wrote on

    I prefer system 2 design.

  34. Kris > wrote on

    I prefer System 2, but not its icons, constructed by lines, with any ugly grey shade. The geometric icons of system 1 are not only more attractive for me, but will work also better in small sizes ><

  35. Santosh Shaastry wrote on

    Masterbrand and browser icons from System 2 together with new apps & services icons from System 1 would be an appealing and great extension of Firefox brand.

  36. Bart wrote on

    Option 1 is definitely better.

  37. Siv wrote on

    I am not a fan of the overly glowing look, I’d prefer something a little more toned down. The trouble with creating anything that looks very trendy at the time is that they will age quickly and need doing again when fashions change. I think you’d be better going with more toned down and well though out icons that won’t age quickly.

  38. Milan Tubic wrote on

    Not sure why there is a need for another icon update.

    The Firefox logo is legendary and the current evolution with the Quantum logo is really nice.

    First thing I notice about the icons (System 1 and 2, not including the General purpose browser icons) is that it’s not immediately clear what they are supposed to do.

    I believe they should be simplified a bit, or done completely from scratch.

    Regarding the general purpose browser icons, if I had to choose System 2 is a bit better. But again, the current Quantum icon is extremely nice and modern, and feels like natural evolution of the previous icons. Also the Quantum icon conveys the message of the Firefox quite well (you can “see” it’s faster), I might be lacking the proper terminology, but I believe you understand what I mean.

    Regarding the Masterbrand logo. System 1 looks (a lot) like the Gitlab logo, no further comments are necessary I think. System 2 is better, but again, not sure why this logo is necessary at all, or why it has to look like Firefox so much, Mozilla is not just Firefox!

    And my last suggestion: Consider evolving (deriving) the other icons from the current Quantum icons. That would be much better in my opinion. Also, the Masterbrand logo should be something completely different, something Mozilla.

  39. Sugeng wrote on

    Love the System 1 logos/brands but the browser icon in System 1 should be changed to browser icon from System 2.

  40. Anant wrote on

    Me too! Group 1 with Group 2 browser icons.

  41. Daniel wrote on

    system 2, is much cooler than the 1, system 1 is something little seen attractive, regards
    :D

  42. Jamil wrote on

    Personally I like system 1 the most but it would be cool if there was a choice between the two

  43. moderndemon84 wrote on

    System 2

  44. yunix wrote on

    system 1 all the way.

  45. Daniele wrote on

    I prefer system 1’s icons except for the masterbrand one. I think that system 2’s Firefox masterbrand icon is more related to the concept of speed and, furthermore, I think that system 1’s masterbrand icon is too similar to the GitLab’s logo.

  46. Vladislav wrote on

    System 2. Uncommon style!

  47. mparus wrote on

    Firefox focus System 1 looks too much like a photo application.

    Also I have no idea what half of these icons represents.

  48. Alain A wrote on

    The system 1 is my favorite…

  49. Alexander wrote on

    System 1❤️

  50. someone wrote on

    Honest opinion: Looks fine don’t change it. Fix open bugs instead…

More comments: 1 24 25 26 27 28 41