Evolving the Firefox Brand

Say “Firefox” and most people think of a web browser on their laptop or phone, period. TL;DR, there’s more to the story now, and our branding needs to evolve.

With the rapid evolution of the internet, people need new tools to make the most of it. So Firefox is creating new types of browsers and a range of new apps and services with the internet as the platform. From easy screen-shotting and file sharing to innovative ways to access the internet using voice and virtual reality, these tools will help people be more efficient, safer, and in control of their time online. Firefox is where purpose meets performance.

Firefox Quantum Browser Icon

As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family. Recoloring that logo or dissecting the fox could only take us so far. We needed to start from a new place.

A team made up of product and brand designers at Mozilla has begun imagining a new system to embrace all of the Firefox products in the pipeline and those still in the minds of our Emerging Technologies group. Working across traditional silos, we’re designing a system that can guide people smoothly from our marketing to our in-product experiences.

Today, we’re sharing our two design system approaches to ask for your feedback.

 

How this works.

For those who recall the Open Design process we used to craft our Mozilla brand identity, our approach here will feel familiar:

  • We are not crowdsourcing the answer.
  • There’ll be no voting.
  • No one is being asked to design anything for free.

Living by our open-source values of transparency and participation, we’re reaching out to our community to learn what people think. You can make your views known by commenting on this blog post below.

Extreme caveat: Although the products and projects are real, these design systems are still a work of fiction. Icons are not final. Each individual icon will undergo several rounds of refinement, or may change entirely, between now and their respective product launches. Our focus at this point is on the system.

We’ll be using these criteria to evaluate the work:

  • Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
  • How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
  • Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
  • Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
  • Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?

All the details.

The brand architecture for both systems is made up of four levels.

Each system leads with a new Firefox masterbrand icon — an umbrella under which our product lines will live.

The masterbrand icon will show up in our marketing, at events, in co-branding with partners, and in places like the Google Play store where our products can be found. Who knows? Someday this icon may be what people think of when they hear the word “Firefox.”

At the general-purpose browser level, we’re proposing to update our Firefox Quantum desktop icon. We continue to simplify and modernize this icon, and people who use Firefox tell us they love it. Firefox Developer Edition and Firefox Nightly are rendered as color variants of the Quantum icon.


Browsers with a singular focus, such as our Firefox Reality browser for VR applications and our privacy-driven Firefox Focus mobile browser, share a common design approach for their icons. These are meant to relate most directly to the master brand as peers to the Firefox Quantum browser icon.

Finally, the icons for new applications and services signal the unique function of each product. Color and graphic treatment unite them and connect them to the master brand. Each icon shape is one of a kind, allowing people to distinguish among choices seen side by side on a screen.

Still in the works are explorations of typography, graphic patterns, motion, naming, events, partnerships, and other elements of the system that, used together with consistency in the product, will form the total brand experience.

Read along as we refine our final system over the next few months. What we roll out will be based on the feedback we receive here, insights we’re gathering from formal user testing, and our product knowledge and design sensibilities.

With your input, we’ll have a final system that will make a Firefox product recognizable out in the world even if a fox is nowhere in sight. And we’ll deliver a consistent experience from an advertisement to a button on a web page. Thanks for joining us on this new journey.

Madhava Enros, Sr. Director, Firefox User Experience

Tim Murray, Creative Director, Mozilla

2,212 comments on “Evolving the Firefox Brand”

  1. Kevyn Tuleu wrote on

    I really liked the 2nd system for the browser icons, it was time to hide the symbol of the planet, plus the first system removed the fox’s paws, and made the face a little strange.
    As for the icons I liked the first system, the second, mixing a bit of 3D, is a bit out of fashion in logos. (automatically translated into English)

  2. Keen Firefoxer wrote on

    My opinion is that the logos are regressive. System 2 I prefer but only because it is less of a change so it can do less damage. I do prefer the logos for the browsers of System 1 though. I don’t see any need to change the distinctive brand that has been developed over time. Anyway this isn’t my project to back seat drive so make the decisions that are best for your project even if I don’t like them.

  3. Katie wrote on

    definitely #1 – it keeps a level of brand consistency while still updating and expanding the look.

  4. rodolpho wrote on

    i liked system 2 with system 1 Firefox logo.

  5. Kieran wrote on

    Firefox has some really nice icons as it is atm…. far better than these proposed changes. Please don’t change just for the sake of it.

  6. Andrew wrote on

    System 2!

  7. Obed Lz wrote on

    System 1 is great!!

  8. Manuel Quarneti wrote on

    Good job designers! Both systems are great, but I prefer the 2nd

  9. Gabriel wrote on

    System 2 looks nice.
    The fox icons are just evocative enough to not be confused with another tech logo calling ~fox.
    The other icons are vivid and delightful curvy with various distinctive color for each one.

    System 1 looks awful : nearly everything is tortured and complex.

  10. Javier wrote on

    I don’t keep any, System 1 does indeed remind me of GitLab, but leaving that aside what has been the Firefox logo is not completely round, it seems deformed and I don’t like it at all while in System 2 that doesn’t happen, it’s a perfect circle and that little detail is very much appreciated, Anyway, the rest of the logos of system 2 look a little simple and too confusing to read, and it’s not that system 1 is saved, maybe it’s a little more readable but let’s say “clearly this corresponds to the icon of images” to give just one example, well, neither…

  11. Charlie wrote on

    System 1 is more coherent, readable, and forward thinking. It enables a larger variety of future applications while capturing the current brand. It has a softness that speaks people over profit, where System 2 feels Sci-Fi/Fantasy in an inhuman way.

  12. Fabian Garcia wrote on

    [Firefox masterbrand icon]
    System 2.

    [General-purpose browser icons]
    System 1.

    [Singulary-focused browser icons]
    System 2.

    [Icons for new app & services]
    System 1 with the System 2 colors.

  13. Peter Yates wrote on

    Looks familiar. Very familiar.

    https://www.happyfox.com

  14. Twitchy wrote on

    System 2! It’s very difficult for me to discern what is different about the System 1 icons at quick glance. They also just seem “harsher” to me, although I know that is highly subjective.

    2.

  15. Jason Walia wrote on

    What I love:
    –System 2 master-brand icons.
    –System 2 icons for apps and services.
    –System 2 singularity focused icons.
    –System 1 general purpose icons.

  16. Mike wrote on

    I think system 1 is the better choice for a change and for the future. I do like the additional colors of system 2 but I believe system 2 is too much like the current icon theme. If you are going for a new look then you nailed it with system 1 and I believe you should use this theme as default. Maybe add some additional blue, green colors to system 1 new apps and services. But beyond that I think system 1 is great. However, if Mozilla wants to keep the icon theme closer to the current default to ensure brand recognition then go with system 2. Both are great choices but system 2 is keeping it safe and system 1 is going for a really far out change IMHO.

  17. BJ Nelson wrote on

    System 1 Master brand with somewhat modified System 2 icons.

  18. Ben wrote on

    I really enjoy System 2, but both of them are really good.

  19. Adrian Anderson wrote on

    I’d choose System 2 Browser Icons, but with reservations on the ‘new App’ icons there. The outlined nature of them seems to be a little at odds with the Browser icons. The parent icon breaks from the fox metaphor to open up to ‘new possibilities’ while embracing it’s providence which i like.

    The System 1 parent icon seems to be a bit too generic and similar to the metamask icon to my mind and it’s app icons a little too generic also.

    I’m a designer who works with brands for what it’s worth.

  20. Anonymous Coward wrote on

    “System 1” masterbrand does look pretty close to gitlab. Neither really competes with symbolism of the current Firefox icon though, since both loose the image of the fox circling the world.

  21. Jesper wrote on

    I love the #1 masterbrand logo. As others have said it is dangerously similar to the GitLab logo, but it looks nice, and I think it’s a better starting point if you want room to branch out and evolve than the curled-up fox logo. But yeah, you might need to iterate on it a bit to see if you can put some distance between that and the GitLab logo.

  22. Niko wrote on

    System 2 is beautiful!

    Only the new apps and services look more polished in System 1 though.

  23. Fadhal Albama wrote on

    group 1 looks better and modern

  24. G wrote on

    System 1!

  25. Guilherme wrote on

    I feel like 1 is too google for my taste… Too material… 2 looks more unique

  26. gaston wrote on

    So obvious…

    System 2 for General Purpose Browser Icons
    System 1 for Singularly Focuses Browser Icons
    System 1 for Icons for new apps & services

    Nothing less nothing more.

  27. Helick wrote on

    System 1 is the winner!

  28. will wrote on

    system 2 looks great, that with the top logo from system 1 would be perfect

  29. Gustavo wrote on

    I love group 2

  30. Aditj wrote on

    System 2

  31. SubGothius wrote on

    I keep thinking the negative space in the middle of the current (and proposed System2) Firefox browser logo should look like a dinosaur/Godzilla (for Mozilla) when turned upside-down. It doesn’t really when you actually try it, but it looks like it should.

  32. stef srour wrote on

    System 2 master icon & browser icon are most familiar and feel like Firefox, but the remaining icons, feel out of place. The disconnect between them makes the other icons random and not very Firefox at all, as you go from the curves (of the master & browser icons) to thinner, broken lines, with a weird shadow behind them. While that is a simple style that makes it easy to add more, it’s still lacking as a cohesive system, missing the mark for the logic you’re aiming for – speed safety etc.

    No where in any of these systems does people over profit come through, but tech definitely does & it’s probably better left to the communications to bring through the brand values.

  33. Steven Weigand wrote on

    I guess between the system 1 and 2 icons, I prefer 2, but I’m honestly not a big fan of either. 1 reminds me too much of gitlab, and 2 isn’t foxy enough.
    General purpose browser icons, I guess I’d prefer to see a blending of 1 and 2. Keep the tail from 2 and put the blue globe back in. I have to say I prefer the older pre quantum icon.
    The rest of the icons are just meh.

  34. Giovani wrote on

    I pick system 2, more beautiful and elegant

  35. Ridhony Hutasoit wrote on

    Be a head, not a tail, so I chose system 1 icon :)

  36. JaKi wrote on

    My favorite is system1: I like the solid shapes and the consistency of the shapes and colors. And the colors are firefox, they clearly say this is firefox!

    System 2 icons (excl. browser icons) could belong to any application, no branding… And they – IMHO – look too childish…

  37. Cameron Steel wrote on

    Think I’d have to go with the master and browser icons from 2 with the rest from 1. Overall system 1 looks more cohesive – 2 has a lot of colour variation

  38. Christopher Buckley wrote on

    I prefer System 1 for the master brand and browser icons.

    But the singularly focused browsers and app icons make more sense to me at a glance in System 2.

  39. Nathan Warden wrote on

    I like system 1 :)

  40. John wrote on

    I like the fox in system 1 but rest of the icons in system 2

  41. tilda wrote on

    IMHO the System 1 Masterbrand icon looks too much like GitLab’s logo.

  42. Alex White-Robinson wrote on

    System 1 browser, system 2 everything else.

    Especially since the system1 ‘masterbrand’ icon is nearly identical to another great FOSS project – Gitlab. Treading on some toes there.

    It’s also very very close to happyfox’s logo (support desk software company) as a user on reddit pointed out.

  43. Vanessasaurus wrote on

    The System 1: Firefox Masterbrand Icon
    – is extremely similar to the GitLab fox. It also is reminiscent of StarFox. If this is to show up with other companies and brands, it’s aleady not unique and might be confusing to users.
    – completely loses the spirit of the original firefox logo.
    – I see the Fox, I’ve lost the fire
    – it would look lovely (and symmetrical) on a shirt
    – For a browser, I expect something circular

    The System 2: Firefox Masterbrand Icon
    – It keeps the old Firefox logo spirit. I don’t directly see Fox or Fire, but I know it’s there!
    – It’s round as I would expect it for a browser.
    – There is potential / opportunity to use the white space
    – It’s not symmetrical
    – I prefer the slight derivates (second row, first full row of three) where you can actually make out the fox.

    System 1 and 2 General Purpose Browser Icons
    – I like them both
    – The second set (System 2) is simpler, with a cleaner closed circle
    – This is one of those comparisons like going to buy a TV – you only notice the differences when directly next to one another.

    System 1: Singularity-focused browser icons
    – Both System 1 and 2 seem to be very general, “I’ve seen these a million times” and they don’t resonate
    wow!
    – If I had to choose, the first set with clearly defined colors would look more appealing on my computer screen, as an icon to click / find what I’m looking for.

    System 1 and 2 Icons for New Apps for Services
    – I like the System 1 set a lot, not so much System 2

    For all of the above, the color choices are beautiful. Bravo! Have you thought about icons that are creative with white space, or use the same color scheme but allocate single (or two) colors to each? Have you run these designs though what they would look like printed on paper, black and white, on dark vs. light backgrounds, or to someone who is color blind?

  44. Daniel wrote on

    I generally prefer system 2, except for the singularly-focused browser icons. I like both master icons, and don’t care for either set of new app/service icons, but in both cases, have a slight preference for system 2. I strongly prefer system 2 for general browser icons.

  45. Antoine wrote on

    System 1!

  46. Boyd wrote on

    I don’t like either one of the new icons. Why mess up perfection??? leave it alone

  47. Obed Lz wrote on

    1 😎

  48. Brian wrote on

    I prefer system 1 and the emphasis on the fox head. The logo MUST have a fox.

    In the Master Logo the curves really give a nice 3D effect with the gradients and make the logo much more vibrant.

    In the Browser logos are fantastic in system 1, although I think the proportions of the fox head to tail are a little out. Tail is too big or the head is too small. And maybe more distinct colours between nightly and dev.

    The Focus icon is the first one I have real issues with (in both systems), it is far too busy for a browser that is supposed to be about simplification. I don’t think any of the icons on this tier really fit with what they are meant to portray.

    The last group, I prefer the style of system 2 but the colours of system 1. System 2 icons don’t feel like they are all part of the same thing.

    I don’t like much in System 2. The Master logo doesn’t say Firefox at all. There is no Fox in there at all. The Browser logos look a bit weird with no globe in the middle and the abstract design makes the fox leg look strange, an undefined appendage.

  49. oooof wrote on

    Please, don’t start going all minimalist on us. We LIKE the fox around the globe, whatever you do keep a fox around a globe. It goes hand in hand with the thunderbird logo which we also like.

  50. Mariano wrote on

    I prefer the full set of System 2 icons. It seems to me clearer than System 1

    Mariano

More comments: 1 20 21 22 23 24 41