Evolving the Firefox Brand

Say “Firefox” and most people think of a web browser on their laptop or phone, period. TL;DR, there’s more to the story now, and our branding needs to evolve.

With the rapid evolution of the internet, people need new tools to make the most of it. So Firefox is creating new types of browsers and a range of new apps and services with the internet as the platform. From easy screen-shotting and file sharing to innovative ways to access the internet using voice and virtual reality, these tools will help people be more efficient, safer, and in control of their time online. Firefox is where purpose meets performance.

Firefox Quantum Browser Icon

As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family. Recoloring that logo or dissecting the fox could only take us so far. We needed to start from a new place.

A team made up of product and brand designers at Mozilla has begun imagining a new system to embrace all of the Firefox products in the pipeline and those still in the minds of our Emerging Technologies group. Working across traditional silos, we’re designing a system that can guide people smoothly from our marketing to our in-product experiences.

Today, we’re sharing our two design system approaches to ask for your feedback.

 

How this works.

For those who recall the Open Design process we used to craft our Mozilla brand identity, our approach here will feel familiar:

  • We are not crowdsourcing the answer.
  • There’ll be no voting.
  • No one is being asked to design anything for free.

Living by our open-source values of transparency and participation, we’re reaching out to our community to learn what people think. You can make your views known by commenting on this blog post below.

Extreme caveat: Although the products and projects are real, these design systems are still a work of fiction. Icons are not final. Each individual icon will undergo several rounds of refinement, or may change entirely, between now and their respective product launches. Our focus at this point is on the system.

We’ll be using these criteria to evaluate the work:

  • Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
  • How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
  • Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
  • Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
  • Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?

All the details.

The brand architecture for both systems is made up of four levels.

Each system leads with a new Firefox masterbrand icon — an umbrella under which our product lines will live.

The masterbrand icon will show up in our marketing, at events, in co-branding with partners, and in places like the Google Play store where our products can be found. Who knows? Someday this icon may be what people think of when they hear the word “Firefox.”

At the general-purpose browser level, we’re proposing to update our Firefox Quantum desktop icon. We continue to simplify and modernize this icon, and people who use Firefox tell us they love it. Firefox Developer Edition and Firefox Nightly are rendered as color variants of the Quantum icon.


Browsers with a singular focus, such as our Firefox Reality browser for VR applications and our privacy-driven Firefox Focus mobile browser, share a common design approach for their icons. These are meant to relate most directly to the master brand as peers to the Firefox Quantum browser icon.

Finally, the icons for new applications and services signal the unique function of each product. Color and graphic treatment unite them and connect them to the master brand. Each icon shape is one of a kind, allowing people to distinguish among choices seen side by side on a screen.

Still in the works are explorations of typography, graphic patterns, motion, naming, events, partnerships, and other elements of the system that, used together with consistency in the product, will form the total brand experience.

Read along as we refine our final system over the next few months. What we roll out will be based on the feedback we receive here, insights we’re gathering from formal user testing, and our product knowledge and design sensibilities.

With your input, we’ll have a final system that will make a Firefox product recognizable out in the world even if a fox is nowhere in sight. And we’ll deliver a consistent experience from an advertisement to a button on a web page. Thanks for joining us on this new journey.

Madhava Enros, Sr. Director, Firefox User Experience

Tim Murray, Creative Director, Mozilla

2,212 comments on “Evolving the Firefox Brand”

  1. Omer Kavak wrote on

    System 2

  2. Pablo Espósito wrote on

    The #1 group is cool

  3. Bill wrote on

    My opinion, as many others, is that I prefer system 1 with the browser icons from system 2.

  4. Ray wrote on

    I like system 2 browser icon, and the rests are system 1 icon

  5. 1252 wrote on

    System 1 please

  6. eeeee wrote on

    Be careful, the GitLab logo almost looks the same.

  7. digitalldesigns wrote on

    For me, the ‘System 1 – Firefox Masterbrand icon’ and ‘Singularly-focused-browser icons’ are very strong / clean / stripped back executions, that work well as stand-alone icons, and as a wider suite.

    Respectfully, I feel the ‘General-purpose browser icons’, and ‘Icons for new apps & services’ feel slightly disjointed when viewed in terms of looking at the whole suite – specifically from a styling perspective.

  8. Frenky wrote on

    System 1, and I want that blue tshirt. <3

  9. Honza wrote on

    I really love the new masterbrand and general purpose icon on the first one. On the second one, i like everything else. Maybe you can recolor the singulary focused icons in system 2 :)

  10. Brendan Webb wrote on

    Love both design approaches. Trial System 1 with some instances of Firefox, and System 2 with some others, but allow to opt out, and request feedback, after, say, 2 weeks of the systems being applied. Also, will you guys be updating the Thunderbird logo as well? Just curious.

  11. oeai wrote on

    S.2 is better
    add vote button with ip.lock
    s.2 is more recognizable and s.1 can be used for early.apps
    the color palette + geometry of S.1 is like a 16bit harder to catch and understand, it is also too different from original and more similar to another worldwide brand.

  12. Matthieu Cannavo wrote on

    System 2 is way better and clearer, more distinctive from competitor

  13. CCekla wrote on

    Overall I like System 2 better, but I agree the color scheme is more cohesive in System 1, especially regarding the apps icons. Ditching the blue globe in the browser logos of System 2 gives a more elegant (and less chrome-y) vibe. My vote goes to System 2 with a color adjustment for the app icons.

  14. Irene wrote on

    I MUST see the fox to identify your browser, so system 2 is completely put of the question. Also, being someone with a predominately visual memory, I “need” the color scheme of #1 (nothing of the vold colors of #2), being that the fox evoques warm colors, a mammal with fur and and a warm body temperature, I also feel that the cold designs of the second part of #2 (that many are favoring) are really the opposite of that warm/fuzzy ideia, those cold lines remind me of a chair made of metal rods! (Cold-hard-not fuzzy). I do not understand how they went in that direction. Simply getting rid of the fox will make you loose the fidelity of a big percentage of people. A “roind thing” identifies a ton of browsers, will dilute the impact of your brand as it is now so closely associated to the name.

  15. Ben wrote on

    Looks just like both the gitlab and happy fox logos.

  16. Lo wrote on

    I prefer system 2 !

  17. Afflygem Garfield wrote on

    I prefer the system 2, but if you can add more violet for firefox focus icon (like actually), it will be better !

  18. Xerlax wrote on

    The group 1.

  19. Dan wrote on

    System 1 feels more unique and innovative.

    It incorporates more life and colour, and is far more versatile than 2. Love the two-tone colourways.

    Whilst 2 is a little bit more coherent, each product doesn’t stand out as much, and the system is harder to accurately replicate.

    My problem with 2 is it feels like I’ve seen it before in maybe Aol. products or Samsung app icons. Whereas 1 is a lot more original.

    Finally, the globe is missing from the browser icon, and the fox isn’t looking at the earth in 2. These are two key devices in the original icon.

  20. Marco wrote on

    Both designs are awesome, but I prefer System 2.

  21. Nalin Mishra wrote on

    I prefer system 2.

    System 1 is too overpowering with the colors, leaving the icons without much individuality to distinguish from one another. Not that they’re bad.

    System 2 looks more modern, and won’t look dated in just a few years, while that’s a real concern with System 1.

  22. gn.fur wrote on

    Group 1 looks nicer, except master icon. It’s terrible.

  23. dyke wrote on

    Also totally agree!
    I prefer group 1, with the browser icons from group 2.

  24. FredM wrote on

    Les icônes du groupe 1 font beaucoup plus dynamique que le groupe 2.

  25. Farshad Sadri wrote on

    Congratulations on the new brand changes. They both look awesome to me, however I prefer the “System 2” set as they are more clean and I suppose look better on small sizes. Also they look more modern than the “System 1” gradient. It looks like first set is more towards 2018 design trends love for gradients which I’m not sure is a good strategy for long term brand run.

    Best of lucks. 😊👌🤞

  26. Christian wrote on

    I love the system 1 masterbrand and almost all the icons. I would prefer to use the general-purpose browser icons of system 2. However, in system 1, I need the burning firefox tail.

  27. Theodore Yankov wrote on

    Personally, I prefer the System 2 icons, because
    1) It doesn’t copy off of the GitLab icon
    2) I prefer my Firefox having a flaming fox in its logo

  28. Oussama wrote on

    System 2 looks more fresh and smooth. Even related products look awesome in system 2 theme

  29. Miguel Aragon wrote on

    System 1

  30. Isabella wrote on

    Master icon of system 1 and browser ícones of system 2.

  31. Sergey wrote on

    System 2.

  32. Laszlo wrote on

    current firefox logo is better then both “system”

  33. Sk710 wrote on

    group 1, with the browser icons from group 2

  34. Lutz wrote on

    Love Version #1

  35. Manc wrote on

    A second variant is better

  36. Josef Krasny wrote on

    System 2 looks better for me.

  37. Nicolò P. wrote on

    I agree with the fact that the “System 1” icons are better but their general-purpose browser icons have some problems. I think the problem of the “System 1” general-purpose browser icons is the fact that the fox’s head seems to be unnaturally squashed downwards and the tail develops too vertically creating an ovalized optical effect. Another small problem with all “System 1” icons is, in my opinion, the excessive use of magenta. I tried to make some quick approximate changes to the first general-purpose browser icon of the “System 1” based on my taste.

    https://ibb.co/fpsDwK

  38. Thibaut wrote on

    I’m a bit confused, none of the 2 systems here are aligned with Mozilla’s branding… Why such a difference?

  39. Mafalda Mota wrote on

    I’m 50/50 on this:
    – for the Masterbrand I prefer the group system 2, as the logo is an abstract take on the one that is being used now, is more likely going to stay in fashion for a longer time and generally looks a lot better and more fun than the one on group 1
    – for the general-purpose browser the group , mostly because of the blue circle in the middle of the fox and because it is recognizable as the browser section of the company’s products
    – for singularity-focused browsers the group 2 again (I personally think that the perfect group would envolve the icons from group 2 in the aesthetics of group 1)
    – and finally for the new apps & services, the group 1.

    Thank you for letting the people speak their minds. Great work!

  40. Fabiano Cordeiro wrote on

    System 2 for masterproject and general use, System 1 for the rest.

  41. Oni_Shadow wrote on

    I think system 1 has more penitential and a stronger branding than system 2.
    All the icon have a “theme” and look like they belong to the same graphic charter.
    (Plus I personally like the origami style it provides.)

  42. Martin wrote on

    I really like System 1 but with System 2’s Master Brand. Not sure about the geometric fox. I think the round fox is such a strong firefox brand it would be a shame to make it geometric instead of round

  43. JeffD wrote on

    I Agree with Ryan Spooner.
    System 2 for the master icon and browser and with System 1 for the other.

    System1 masterbrand icon make me thing about Gitlab, I prefer one circle to represent the community side and the movement to make web open.

  44. J Lastort wrote on

    I prefer #1. the colors are similar to the current ones and the designs are unusual.

  45. sabriayadi wrote on

    system 2

  46. Michael wrote on

    System 1 master icon is very similar to gitlab. Generally system 2 feels more firefox to me

  47. fiesco wrote on

    I absolutely prefer System 1. It looks more unique and reminds me more of the Firefox brand while taking it to the next level of branding.

  48. Matěj Mňouček wrote on

    System 1

  49. Gunther Wilke wrote on

    I like the fox icon of sys 1, the next 5 icons of sys 2 and then I like sys 1 again

  50. Justin wrote on

    I love the system 1 theme and flow

More comments: 1 25 26 27 28 29 41