Evolving the Firefox Brand

Say “Firefox” and most people think of a web browser on their laptop or phone, period. TL;DR, there’s more to the story now, and our branding needs to evolve.

With the rapid evolution of the internet, people need new tools to make the most of it. So Firefox is creating new types of browsers and a range of new apps and services with the internet as the platform. From easy screen-shotting and file sharing to innovative ways to access the internet using voice and virtual reality, these tools will help people be more efficient, safer, and in control of their time online. Firefox is where purpose meets performance.

Firefox Quantum Browser Icon

As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family. Recoloring that logo or dissecting the fox could only take us so far. We needed to start from a new place.

A team made up of product and brand designers at Mozilla has begun imagining a new system to embrace all of the Firefox products in the pipeline and those still in the minds of our Emerging Technologies group. Working across traditional silos, we’re designing a system that can guide people smoothly from our marketing to our in-product experiences.

Today, we’re sharing our two design system approaches to ask for your feedback.

 

How this works.

For those who recall the Open Design process we used to craft our Mozilla brand identity, our approach here will feel familiar:

  • We are not crowdsourcing the answer.
  • There’ll be no voting.
  • No one is being asked to design anything for free.

Living by our open-source values of transparency and participation, we’re reaching out to our community to learn what people think. You can make your views known by commenting on this blog post below.

Extreme caveat: Although the products and projects are real, these design systems are still a work of fiction. Icons are not final. Each individual icon will undergo several rounds of refinement, or may change entirely, between now and their respective product launches. Our focus at this point is on the system.

We’ll be using these criteria to evaluate the work:

  • Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
  • How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
  • Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
  • Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
  • Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?

All the details.

The brand architecture for both systems is made up of four levels.

Each system leads with a new Firefox masterbrand icon — an umbrella under which our product lines will live.

The masterbrand icon will show up in our marketing, at events, in co-branding with partners, and in places like the Google Play store where our products can be found. Who knows? Someday this icon may be what people think of when they hear the word “Firefox.”

At the general-purpose browser level, we’re proposing to update our Firefox Quantum desktop icon. We continue to simplify and modernize this icon, and people who use Firefox tell us they love it. Firefox Developer Edition and Firefox Nightly are rendered as color variants of the Quantum icon.


Browsers with a singular focus, such as our Firefox Reality browser for VR applications and our privacy-driven Firefox Focus mobile browser, share a common design approach for their icons. These are meant to relate most directly to the master brand as peers to the Firefox Quantum browser icon.

Finally, the icons for new applications and services signal the unique function of each product. Color and graphic treatment unite them and connect them to the master brand. Each icon shape is one of a kind, allowing people to distinguish among choices seen side by side on a screen.

Still in the works are explorations of typography, graphic patterns, motion, naming, events, partnerships, and other elements of the system that, used together with consistency in the product, will form the total brand experience.

Read along as we refine our final system over the next few months. What we roll out will be based on the feedback we receive here, insights we’re gathering from formal user testing, and our product knowledge and design sensibilities.

With your input, we’ll have a final system that will make a Firefox product recognizable out in the world even if a fox is nowhere in sight. And we’ll deliver a consistent experience from an advertisement to a button on a web page. Thanks for joining us on this new journey.

Madhava Enros, Sr. Director, Firefox User Experience

Tim Murray, Creative Director, Mozilla

2,212 comments on “Evolving the Firefox Brand”

  1. Cyrus wrote on

    I love the new direction overall! I think the non-browser icons for system one are more self-descriptive and intuitive, and I like the more solid silouhettes. The icons for system two look less distinct from each other, which from a purely-practical standpoint might mean accidentally opening the wrong app from time to time!

  2. Ycdp wrote on

    System 1

  3. Augusto César wrote on

    System 2

  4. Kaio Henrique dos Santos Silva wrote on

    Not change, Please

  5. Victor Prado wrote on

    System 2 is better

  6. Richie Bonilla wrote on

    System 2 feels more mature and elegant. Feels like the browser it represents has more depth and history.

    System 1 feels a bit childish, like it’s for a “Firefox for Kids” browser.

  7. Ewa Haughian wrote on

    Instantly I liked the system 1 more – it looks more sharp and modern to me, but why so many such bright colors?
    The brand’s orange is not standing out any more and the icons start looking alike all the rainbow themed branding around (Instagram and all who copied it). Overall I would say – great job, but consider the colors again.

  8. Mini wrote on

    Nice work! Both have different strengths, but overall I like system 2 much more. I think the Master logo for 1 looks fairly generic/trendy and doesn’t have any hint at the current logo other than it’s the same animal. System 2 has the same shape as the current logo and while swooshes can also be seen as fairly unexciting, this one mimics the current logo and the points that look like fox ears is clever. System 2 overall has nods to it’s roots which people will still recognize. I like that the browser icon still has the paw included in 2. System 1 with the big head and extended tail doesn’t look near as sleek as 2’s. I think people quite like the current look of the fox, don’t be so quick to get rid of it/make it unrecognizable!

  9. RSantos wrote on

    I design for a living and system 2 gets my vote. I see issues arising with system 1 browser icons when they are reduced in size. They get lost in translation. When enlarged though they are quite beautiful but system 2 has cleaner edges and reads well at both reduced/enlarged versions.

  10. Tim wrote on

    I know this is a nightmare for designers…

    Masterbrand icon: system 2
    General-purpose browser icons: system 2
    Singularly-focused browser icons: system 1
    icons for new apps and services: system 1

  11. Leo wrote on

    For me, I love the current browser icon, so I’d stay, in that aspect, with system 2 — BUT keeping the blue globe. On the other uses, system 1 seems better in general

  12. Sarah wrote on

    Both look great but System 1 looks exactly like HappyFox

  13. Lorelle wrote on

    2222222222222

    Need the fire. I have always scored the circle, standing out against the blocks in the world.

  14. Sarikha wrote on

    System 2 ones are the best. System 1 looks too over-engineered and the familiarity with Firefox is lost

  15. Stefany wrote on

    System 1 is so superior that I’m not even sure why there is a question (it also looks great on a shirt).

  16. Kees Kouwenberg wrote on

    Masterbrand 2, all other 1

  17. Vic wrote on

    I dont care what the next icon is, I’m still going to replace it with icons from Netscape and Mozilla. Long live Netscape Navigator!

  18. Arnaud wrote on

    Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
    Yes except for system 2’s new app

    How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
    Yes but why change the colour pallet on the icons for new app and services? I feels too different from the masterBrand.

    Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
    I think they can but I don’t know what some represent.

    Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
    System 1’s system focused and other app icons seems a bit too complicated (colors).

    Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?
    I don’t know how to achieve that but it doesn’t feel like you want to spy on us.

    Other thoughts
    The masterBrand from system1 doesn’t look like Firefox to me (it is just a fox). I always saw Firefox with round shapes.
    Both general purpose web browser icons are looking good.

    The others from system 2 are a bit too simple.
    The gradient from system 2 is easier on the eye.

  19. Barbara wrote on

    System 1

  20. Paul wrote on

    There is no “fire” in the system 1 masterbrand icon. It’s just a nice, stylized fox head. Nothing about it says “Firefox”.

    I think this is the problem of going backwards once a brand has been developed and established as the web browser Firefox has. Creating a “parent” brand to house an established brand and subsequent brands is very tricky. Because of this, I propose the following:

    For me, the Firefox web browser icon should be the masterbrand icon.
    It is the most recognizable of them all and should be the head of all logos.

    The masterbrand 2 icon should then be the new web browser icon followed by the rest.

    To be honest, all of the rest are so generic that it could be from any random company. I would try to make the icons more custom, adding a fire element in each somehow. After all, the whole point of the entire brand is the speed on which the services are built. The icons should reflect that.

  21. RayLuz wrote on

    System 2

  22. Momo wrote on

    To me it is clearly system 1. the main reason why I would not want so see system 2 is, that it doesn’t hold up to:

    – Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?

    System 2 looks thin and empty as if there is no confidence in the icon thus there is no confidence in the product. The lack of area in these icons make it appear unimportant from my point of view.

    System 1 on the other hand has all it needs.

    – Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
    System 1 definitely. I saw the icon set and I right away knew it was Firefox.

    – How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
    System 1 looks very cohesive to me. It has a clear pattern. In the case of system 2, the further down I go the less familiar and recognizable the icons were to me.

    – Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
    Here they are on pair i believe.

    – Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?
    Goes together with what I already wrote about the very first point. System 1 looks confident and clean. System 2 is rather shy and lacks confidence in my opinion.

  23. Douglas wrote on

    I vote for:

    System 1 – Firefox Masterbrand Icon – ✓ I love it, is beautiful

    System 1 – General-purpose browser icons ✓

    System 1 – Singularly-focused browser icons ✓

    System 1 – Icons for new apps & services ✓

    This is my decision because use the colors with I identify with my favorite Browser.

  24. Henry wrote on

    Definitely prefer System 2. I didn’t get the stylized fox head of System 1 until ARS mentioned it. System 2 looks clean and uncluttered.

  25. Heather Sowell wrote on

    I’m a dedicated Firefox user and I think all of the icons in Group 2 are fabulous. They are clean, simple, crisp and uncluttered – exactly consistent with my experience using Firefox. Keep the design simple and classy – go with Group 2!

  26. Michael Millonig wrote on

    Love System 1, hate system 2

  27. Jay-Jay wrote on

    I love system 2 — the icons are very clean and easily discernible from others.

  28. Su schachter wrote on

    I also agree with Tyler, i love the fox as “foxy” as possible, but for the rest system 1 (tho i don’t love them, keep tweeking!).

  29. Mario wrote on

    System 1 but browser icons don’t look nice.
    Everything else is amazing maybe icons for new apps & services could be better
    but overall:
    – System 1: 8/10
    – System 2: 5/10 – because of better browser icons.

  30. matheo wrote on

    Group 1

  31. Chris wrote on

    System 1 looks like Google. System 2 looks like Microsoft Office from the mid 2000s. Is it too late to start over?

  32. Glauber GF wrote on

    Eu particularmente uso o Firefox desde seu lançamento lá por 2006, sendo assim usei também outros navegadores como Opera e Chrome mas o Firefox é amor a primeira vista. Acho interessante dar uma repaginada nos ícones sim pois em toda área da TI as coisas sempre estão em constante atualização, logo, porque não o Firefox não atualizar seus ícones!?

  33. Gabriel wrote on

    The icon of System 1 is equal Gitlab icon.

  34. Wilson Edwards wrote on

    Me gusta el grupo uno donde tienen un logo que realmente parece un zorro. El resto no me gusta porque no tiene relación al nombre firefox (zorro de fuego)
    Creo que el logo debe seguir guardando relacion con el nombre, por eso me gusta el que parece una cabeza de zorro y que tienen puesto en la foto frente al local de Mozilla

  35. Olivier wrote on

    Overall, I prefer system 1, but..

    – Do these two systems still feel like Firefox?
    In both sets, the masterbrand and browser icons feel like Firefox.
    – How visually cohesive is each of them? Does each hold together?
    I think the first system is more cohesive. However, the 3 browser icons have a somewhat different style than all the other icons which are more geometrical. There is cohesiveness both thru geometry and colour, where blue stands out for the singular related icons. That said, I don’t see why there should be 4 discs surrounding an image and the icon with a hexagon reminded me of Chrome! I also find the icons of system 2 easier to identify and distinguish between them.
    – Can the design logic of these systems stretch to embrace new products in the future?
    The first system thru geometry variations and the second system thru colour variations and possibly more.
    – Do these systems reinforce the speed, safety, reliability, wit, and innovation that Firefox stands for?
    The more rigourous and machine like icons of system 1 would more closely match those qualities IMHO.
    – Do these systems suggest our position as a tech company that puts people over profit?
    A tech company, yes, but I don’t see an emphasis on “people over profit” in either, to be honest. Maybe the Chrome-like icon could have represented something like hands holding wrists in a circle to convey a more human collaborative meaning, but then the geometrical cohesiveness would have been broken.
    Also, I noticed a comment about colour-blind users and I’d like to suggest adding a silver star or crescent in the top left corner of nightly versions. It may also be worthwhile seeing what it would be like to use circular yellow edges for the master brand icon depicting a fox instead of straight left and right diagonal edges. A part from that, I think Gitlab have more of an issue using a logo representing a foxes head than firefox!

  36. Renato wrote on

    System 1

  37. pein_32 wrote on

    System Icon Group 1 i love soo much!

  38. Aurelien wrote on

    Definitively system 2: it’s simpler and there is a feeling of movement/speed. It illustrates better what a browser should be: simple and fast.

  39. Chris wrote on

    Group 1 masterbrand, with the browser icons from group 2.

  40. Brian Campbell wrote on

    Both of these designs look awful, and do the brand no favours! Hire the person that did the Charamel add on. That person has talent!

  41. ch wrote on

    One vote for System 1 but with the general-purpose browser icons from System 2, but add back in the blue circle in the middle of those.

  42. Erik Araujo wrote on

    Olá, Developers

    Há como mesclar os ícones “system 1” e “system 2”, pois eles estariam gerando o “system 3” e agregando nos novos valores. O que acham?

    Em todo o caso, podemos continuar com o System 1. ;)

  43. Bish wrote on

    Wow, tough call here as I get the need to look at the entire system and make it coherent, but unsure it’s working for me. System 1 master logo is a bit too on the nose, but trying too hard to do more than needed. Unsure if you’re looking for that FedEx moment with the two play button arrows facing each other? Also unsure what the orange overlay is meant to be as to me it feels like a veil which then begs the question why is it veiled? System 2 master logo is a less abrupt change with it focusing on the tail and making the current logo more clean and simplified, but maybe it needs to be rotated? It just feels off for some reason. Good luck as a logo really can be anything if the brand is strong. People will not walk away from a great brand based on the logo, but a good one definitely helps.

  44. Matheus wrote on

    System 1 looks nice to me.

  45. Naiyer Asif wrote on

    System 1 reflects the distinctive Firefox brand except for the Masterbrand logo which looks suspiciously similar to that of Gitlab. Even color schemes are dangerously close. The Masterbrand logo of System 2 is more in line with Firefox aesthetics. I’d suggest to go with the current masterbrand logo which is easily recognizable and choose the solid icons of System 1 for the rest of the branding.

  46. Francesco Pongiluppi wrote on

    I started reading all the comments but I got tired (but someone mentioned Phoenix 0.1 <3). My take: I love the Firefox masterbrand icon and general purpose browsers icons from System 2, for everything else System 1.

  47. Anonymous Anonimizer wrote on

    The Firefox masterbrand icon from System 1 is kind of similar to GitLab’s logo.

  48. Keisha wrote on

    Prefer Group 1 ❤️

  49. Ivan wrote on

    Please do not change icon Firefox.

  50. Muhammed Hüseyinoğlu wrote on

    System 2 Masterbrand and General Browser, System 1 everything else

More comments: 1 27 28 29 30 31 41